As I have been explaining for some time now, our contemporary world is in the grip of a Rothschild-dominated criminocracy, which I have termed the Zionist single global mafia.
To me it would be treason, however it's good of you to ask now we can get into the logic behind it all.
The topic of politici committing treason appears rather frequently - specially considering the consequences of the fraudulent pandemic.
I'm Australian and many people here feel that Scott Morrison the PM at the time committed treason by betraying our trust by needlessly pushing the experimental jabs onto the public and which have caused excess deaths and lots of misery - I hope you're up to date on that - the point here is that it was the betrayal of trust which in my view amounted to treason.
What the public considers to be treason isn't the same as the legal definition under Australian federal laws which only considers aiding the enemy to be treason but not when the trust of the public has been broken.
The penalty for treason was death however now it's only life in prison.
Politici are under oath - but not to the public [although many people wrongfully believe they are] - Commonwealth politici are under oath to the King.
So who does the King pledge allegiance to?
A biblical figure the King of Judea but we all know that it's covertly to the Rothschilds but that's another story and then we're talking the City of London Corporation.
Interesting how members of congress take the pledge to support the same cabal as the King.
In the end it makes me appreciate the ideology behind anarchism even more as I believe that every normal person has an inate sense of what's right and what's wrong, we don't need politici or uniforms for that, anyway that's another story, apologies for the long post.
We're all being played - The fraudulent plandemic revealed how they all followed suit.
Even though many people are convinced that politici have committed treason they're operating under a system that's designed so they can remain ''untouchable'' while anyone who dares to expose their hypocrisy shall be thrown under the bus.
I'm aware governments are registered as corporations however then who are it's shareholders as it's obviously not the public while I suspect that it leads back to Geneva and ultimately the Rothschilds.
Right. The real corporate owners use public money as a counterbalance to leverage off of. They need to short somebody. What do you know, it’s your 401K.
“The Zionist single global mafia” or “criminocracy” are led by psychopaths. My preferred term for this entity that rules or leads the contemporary world is “a pathocracy”. Some ethnic groups produce more (naturally born) psychopaths and more (learned) sociopaths per capita than other ethnic groups. In my personal opinion, with which opinion I don’t expect anyone to agree, an ethnic group which truly believes itself to be the “chosen people” of the creator of the universe would produce more psychopaths and sociopaths than an ethnic group that considers itself non-special or non-superior.
The world was automagically transformed into a military-intelligence–operation-coordinated global totalitarian prison for The Greater Good!"
The project for global domination picked up speed after 9/11 and accelerated with every manufactured crisis.
It's too bad the real 9/11 criminals were "not" held accountable. If they were, most of the other sadistic intelligence operations which quickly followed would've been nipped in the bud.
A global totalitarian prison became humanity's fate once the intelligence agencies merged with organized crime and now with billionaire techno/fascists.
It doesn't make a difference who you vote for--there's no way out via a ballot box. They control it all.
Check your Starlink we're almost at the prison gates now. 🤑
“xii. A person who claims that any suggestion of a group of very rich and powerful people secretly controlling the world, whether or not a Jewish dimension is mentioned, is effectively anti-semitic.” — This one is particularly redolent of unwitting admission … surely, an intellectual own-goal by any measure.
Yes indeed. I have been banned for life from one forum for pointing that out, that accusations of 'anti-semitism' when an illegal, immoral, unethical or otherwise scurrilous activity is condemned, without attribution of blame, rather confirm the link than otherwise.
The Zionist’s power comes from their control of the Central Banks of the world that practice usury with their debt based fiat money. A term I favour for the criminocracy/global mafia/giant vampire squid is the BanksterZ.
And to be accurate these Zionists and their minions of some kind of eastern European or Turkic extraction, are freely slaughtering the Palestinian Semites under the (uncomfortably) benevolent gaze of western governments. Now that is anti semetic, in a world where bad is good, stupid is intelligent and the legacy media are arbiters of truth.
I couldn't have said it better. It's a scandal, and it makes me sad and furious that the vast majority is so incredibly lazy, stupid, uptight, corrupt, criminal, and so easily fooled by the "potato in the exhaust pipe," as Thomas Mars (Juxtaposition1) likes to call it.
This overcomplication is based on a fallacy and won't work! We have to call a group what it calls itself i.e. Jews/Jewish - that's it basis (whether it has historical discrepancies with previous versions or not). Saying, oh most are brainwashed into fear of their powerful leaders and there are some who actually disagree blah blah blah - is a fallacy! They all belong to the same group and that's called "Jewish" - when we say "The Japaese bombed Pearl Harbour" we don't refer to every single Japanese person and their indivual opinion on this matter - that is a total fallacy! It is accetped to refer to a group by what it calls itself and it's chief belief and characteristic i.e Judaism. The only reason to not do this is because of fear of the consequences but that's not brave and it is not truthful. Call a thing what it actually is! If some members of that group don't like that idea then they can leave that group. This fear of speaking without a mealy mouth is a waste of time and plays into the hands of the deceivers - it is exactly what they want!
No. What really plays into the hands of the deceivers is confirming their lie that anti-Zionism equals anti-semitism by referring to "the Jews" rather than to Zionists or Jewish supremacists. It is as ridiculous to label all Jews supremacists as it is to regard all white people as white supremacists. But then, by your reckoning, if I don't like that association I should "leave" the white group. Not sure how I can do that...
I understand your perspective here, but I also understand Ftinking Badge's perspective as well.
As far as I can tell Judaism is a Kabbalistic occult society which, like all Kabbalistic occult societies, deceives most of its members about its goals. Such occult societies - whether freemasons, Ismailis, knights templar, theosophists, scientologists, etc. - are evil in philosophy, in intent, and always produce evil consequences. All these groups contain many members who have no idea what their group's real goals are - but the groups still direct all their members' actions in pursuit of those goals.
So Judaism is a problem - and anyone who chooses to self-identify as a Jew is - at least to some degree - part of the problem. It is that very act of identifying as a Jew which allows someone's actions to be influenced and directed by the group.
Despite all that - it is also correct to suggest that marching up a narrow path to attack a well-defended clifftop fortress is a dumb idea.
One thing that the enemy has cleverly done is to mix both race and religion into the same term. Is anyone descended from a Jew also a Jew? Or is a Jew someone who believes in the Jewish religion? Or is a Jew someone who particpates in the Jewish business/politics influence club? Clearly being born as the child of Jewish parents cannot be a fault (although it could correlate with indoctrination and subsequent bad behavior).
The above is just rambling really - I don't quite think your framing of a new definition of Zionism is sufficient, but I do agree that just saying "It's the Jews" doesn't work well either.
Yes but fear of being labelled and called names is dictating the agenda for you here. We have to care less about what they call us, and to be preapred to be called the worst things - when we do that rather than resort to fallacies then that's the only way the brainwashing will start to fail to work. As for 'supremacy' that IS a genuine part of Judaism - "the chosen ones!" - it has been reinforced again and again by every Jew I have ever met in every aspect of their lives and upbringing, good, bad or indifferent. It can be argued that supremacy IS Judaism. Hiding behind the label "Zionism" is trying to avoid being called 'anti-semitic' - it is very weak and will not work with 'expanded definitions'. As for leaving the group - if a group is not racial (Judaism is clearly not despite the claims of some - there is no Jewish DNA) then belonging to it is a choice. Jews can convert to Christ and be no longer Jewish. "White ethnicity" is a recent perjoritive label (mostly used again by the enemies of people with 'white skin' but ridiculously taken up by some of those 'white skinned' people as the only 'skin' (hehe) they have in the game) and 'white-ness' is mostly defined by what it is not and is very weak and meaningless as a cohesive group.
No, I am not "weak", thank you very much. Neither am I afraid of labels - I have already been branded "anti-semitic" for highlighting the zio-imperialist nature of the global criminocracy and the leading role of the Rothschilds. The truth of the matter is that I am opposed to these vile people because of what they have done, are doing and plan to do, rather than because of their belonging to a particular ethno/religious/cultural group and I think it is important to be clear about that. You are right that there is a supremacist element in the very idea of a "chosen" people, but individual Jewish people do not all embrace that conceit on a personal or political level. I know that from personal experience. Your insistence on a hyper-simplified picture is typical of the mindset that unfortunately dominates contemporary discourse. If you are looking for rants about "the Jews" you have come to the wrong place.
You may or not be weak but its the position you are putting forward which is weak and is going to fail. Ultimately we have to call out the Jews, as a group, on the evidence and on their behaviour as a group alone - the totality of what is done in that groups name. Calling it different names is part of the deception and their way of avoiding accountability. Were Jesus, Peter, Paul, etc "ranting about the Jews"? No, they were calling out boldly and clearly bad faith, bad action, bad intent on the group.
Surely "dark occult" and "ancient psychologists" are even more vague 'boxes' than the ACTUAL group? Why are we so frightened of the Truth? Anyone who doesn't want to be in that group can leave it anytime - by staying there they agree with its actions in their name.
I rather think "natural law" is itself an invention of the occult. As a concept it is/was part of the enlightenment - which was itself an occult, Luciferian endeavor.
It goes hand in hand with Jewish occult philosophy of Nature as God (see Spinoza).
Prior to the enlightenment there was the concept of divine law - which is a much better concept because it cannot be corrupted.
The problem with natural law, which as initially advocated looked exactly like divine law which it was intended to replace, is that it is, by definition, derived by reason. The problem with that is that it is therefore changeable and hence corruptible - which is exactly by design.
Divine law is protected against change because it is revealed only once and not subject to change by man.
Because of all the good Jews that there are, we can't go around naming the Jews as evil. Therefore, we need some way to separate out the Babylonian/Canaanite blood drinkers from the Jews they use as a shill for their evil deeds. The use of the term Zionism is about as right-on as I've heard. What about all the anti-Zionist Jews, and the atheist Jews? They don't count?
It's the best I can do as a dividing line - not Jews per se but Zionism understood as Jewish supremacism using the "anti-semitism" smear to disqualify any opposition to that Jewish supremacism.
Zionist is a term used to cover up the true core of this evil. Judaic Supremacist is a more accurate term. A Judaic Supremacist is (anyone of any race) who ascribes to the ethnocentrically racist belief that one tribe/ race/ group of people are "chosen" by "God" and are therefore superior to all other people.
Hi, that's interesting, but I think the word "Zionism" is a semantic scam, which decision-makers or controllers or even the criminocracy use to confuse the issue.
This word was originally invented by Nathan Birnbaum, a member of the "Hibat Tsion" movement (or literally "affection for Zion" known as "The Lovers of Zion"), who advocated a return to the Land of Israel as a solution to anti-Semitism - a word also coined at the same time by another Jew, Moritz Steinschneidern, and which is also a semantic manipulation (Arabs are also Semites).
Let's not forget that this is happening in the heart of Europe at the end of the 19th century, and that the forces of money and the emergence of modern capitalism are becoming internationalized through banking and railways in particular (and thanks to Baron Edmond de Rothschild, the Jewish
Colonization Association and the Universal Israelite Alliance).
A few years later, Nathan Birnbaum, who had campaigned in favor of nascent Zionism and who thought that Zionism was the only solution to protect the Jewish people, would distance himself from it and prefer Orthodox Judaism; he would have a more cultural approach, totally detached from the geographical return to the Land of Israel, and would become very critical of it.
He would call the Zionists "idolaters," and I quote:
-"They have elevated to the rank of idols the noise of machines, the din of engines, the tumult of carriages and the cacophony of the Stock Exchange." Or again:
-"They are not aware that in their fight against murder, murder is a legitimate means in their eyes. They want to found their world on anarchy, debauchery, and delusions of grandeur."
And as for the Land of Israel, he was against the beliefs of secular Zionism and its nationalist conception.
We can clearly see that from the beginning, Zionism was already criticized by some Jews and that later other Zionist Jews would leave it.
We know the rest and what can be seen as a method of the global mafia is (and that's what's really important) that it was necessary to establish a (Jewish) nationalism in the Middle East. And this is all the more easily understood because the time was one of the dislocation of empires in favor of nationalist states.
The continuation of the Zionist scam then made its way. Moreover, if we look at Israelite nationalism, it did not deviate from the rules of covid ("vaccine", isolation, etc.) and also follows the global "trend" and launched its digital shekel.
The reality is that the criticism of Zionism is a ruse (just like anti-Semitism which can also be) to mask the ideology of domination. Criticizing Zionism is tantamount to criticizing a political and economic ideology (one cannot exist without the other), and certainly not Jews as a whole. It's a useful smokescreen.
There is the light occult and the dark occult. Knowledge used for good OR evil.
The new world order is built upon the principle of CARE.
Those who care enough will win and the dark occult has much more care at the moment.
The G in freemasonry stands for the GENERATING principle and CARE is the generator of ACTION!!!
The freedom movement does not CARE about action. It cares about individual micro issues and conspiracies which is why we're getting absolutely nowhere. We may have to endure unimaginable suffering before we realise.
If we don't start singing in unison about natural law and the REQUIREMENTS of freedom then we'll ALL SUFFER the karmic consequences of INACTION.
THAT'S HOW IT WORKS MY FRIENDS WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT.
Only the Jews, Zionists or not, that consider themselves as "Gods chosen people" are a problem for the world and themselves That ignorant tremendously idotic arrogance causes all the suffering in relation with Jews - for others and themselves. With that unfounded and anti-spiritual belief they exclude themselves from the human family and wonder why they are mistrusted and disliked by the rest of humanity.
The dark occult KNOW that karma and the law of consequence applies so they foolishly believe that they can avoid karmic consequences by getting the order followers to do their dirty work.
They are in a war against the creator and the applicable laws of nature.
After all, it is the order followers that commit the atrocities.
Thanks for posting that information. I expect you are familiar with Mark Passio. He would agree with Walter Veith that the Truth is fragmented within many perspectives.Passio’s sales pitch is Natural Law, which is the middle Pilar in Freemasonry ( building 7 on 911). The ladder spiralling around the middle Pilar is as close as we can get to perfection with protection. I get good feedback from sharing this episode from Passio’s web casts. Scroll to 15min and start from there. He does 15 min housekeeping. Now I will read King James Demonology. I have discussed King James once today. Natural Law has its way.
A politician who is ignoring the interests of their own nation while catering to interest of the Zionist agenda is committing treason.
If a congressman signed a petition circulated in American congress promising to support Israel, is this admissible evidence of treason?
Aren't you referring to the pledge?
No pledge no campaign funds.
To me it would be treason, however it's good of you to ask now we can get into the logic behind it all.
The topic of politici committing treason appears rather frequently - specially considering the consequences of the fraudulent pandemic.
I'm Australian and many people here feel that Scott Morrison the PM at the time committed treason by betraying our trust by needlessly pushing the experimental jabs onto the public and which have caused excess deaths and lots of misery - I hope you're up to date on that - the point here is that it was the betrayal of trust which in my view amounted to treason.
What the public considers to be treason isn't the same as the legal definition under Australian federal laws which only considers aiding the enemy to be treason but not when the trust of the public has been broken.
The penalty for treason was death however now it's only life in prison.
Politici are under oath - but not to the public [although many people wrongfully believe they are] - Commonwealth politici are under oath to the King.
So who does the King pledge allegiance to?
A biblical figure the King of Judea but we all know that it's covertly to the Rothschilds but that's another story and then we're talking the City of London Corporation.
Interesting how members of congress take the pledge to support the same cabal as the King.
In the end it makes me appreciate the ideology behind anarchism even more as I believe that every normal person has an inate sense of what's right and what's wrong, we don't need politici or uniforms for that, anyway that's another story, apologies for the long post.
Can we assemble a grand jury to decide whether it is or not?
Isn't treasonous for politici to place the interest of another nation above that of their own?
No land has a native government. We've all got a foreign corporation.
We're all being played - The fraudulent plandemic revealed how they all followed suit.
Even though many people are convinced that politici have committed treason they're operating under a system that's designed so they can remain ''untouchable'' while anyone who dares to expose their hypocrisy shall be thrown under the bus.
I'm aware governments are registered as corporations however then who are it's shareholders as it's obviously not the public while I suspect that it leads back to Geneva and ultimately the Rothschilds.
Right. The real corporate owners use public money as a counterbalance to leverage off of. They need to short somebody. What do you know, it’s your 401K.
“The Zionist single global mafia” or “criminocracy” are led by psychopaths. My preferred term for this entity that rules or leads the contemporary world is “a pathocracy”. Some ethnic groups produce more (naturally born) psychopaths and more (learned) sociopaths per capita than other ethnic groups. In my personal opinion, with which opinion I don’t expect anyone to agree, an ethnic group which truly believes itself to be the “chosen people” of the creator of the universe would produce more psychopaths and sociopaths than an ethnic group that considers itself non-special or non-superior.
The world was automagically transformed into a military-intelligence–operation-coordinated global totalitarian prison for The Greater Good!"
The project for global domination picked up speed after 9/11 and accelerated with every manufactured crisis.
It's too bad the real 9/11 criminals were "not" held accountable. If they were, most of the other sadistic intelligence operations which quickly followed would've been nipped in the bud.
A global totalitarian prison became humanity's fate once the intelligence agencies merged with organized crime and now with billionaire techno/fascists.
It doesn't make a difference who you vote for--there's no way out via a ballot box. They control it all.
Check your Starlink we're almost at the prison gates now. 🤑
https://open.substack.com/pub/margaretannaalice/p/memes-by-themes-16-the-covid-big?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=b71t5
I'm afraid we are in the prison already.
- https://odysee.com/@psinergy:f?view=content
- https://rumble.com/user/Psinergy
- http://psinergy.com/
- https://rumble.com/user/nonvaxer420
- https://juxtaposition1.substack.com/
- https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/
Nailed it!
“xii. A person who claims that any suggestion of a group of very rich and powerful people secretly controlling the world, whether or not a Jewish dimension is mentioned, is effectively anti-semitic.” — This one is particularly redolent of unwitting admission … surely, an intellectual own-goal by any measure.
Yes indeed. I have been banned for life from one forum for pointing that out, that accusations of 'anti-semitism' when an illegal, immoral, unethical or otherwise scurrilous activity is condemned, without attribution of blame, rather confirm the link than otherwise.
This is great, Paul. I am going to save your definition as a PDF, and use it as a directive to train AI.
Thanks. Cool!
Strong revised definition.. can't argue any of it.
Thank you - a very good definition!
As Pat Buchanan quipped of DC years ago before they cancelled him "Capitol Hill is Israeli Occupied Territory"
The Zionist’s power comes from their control of the Central Banks of the world that practice usury with their debt based fiat money. A term I favour for the criminocracy/global mafia/giant vampire squid is the BanksterZ.
It should be mentioned that the modern state of ISrahell has nearly nothing in common with the ancient Israelites or with Semites.
The ISrahelli people are nearly all from a quite different region and just placed there.
And they themselves are the ancestors of biblical Edom/Esau - color RED! -, that they claim the others are, who are the ancestors of biblical Jacob.
Everything regarding ISrahell is the opposite, it's ALL A BIG FAT LIE!
And to be accurate these Zionists and their minions of some kind of eastern European or Turkic extraction, are freely slaughtering the Palestinian Semites under the (uncomfortably) benevolent gaze of western governments. Now that is anti semetic, in a world where bad is good, stupid is intelligent and the legacy media are arbiters of truth.
I couldn't have said it better. It's a scandal, and it makes me sad and furious that the vast majority is so incredibly lazy, stupid, uptight, corrupt, criminal, and so easily fooled by the "potato in the exhaust pipe," as Thomas Mars (Juxtaposition1) likes to call it.
Omniwar - https://omniwar.ca/
Nothing to see here, move on - https://coronistan.blogspot.com/p/nichts-zu-sehen-hier-bitte-weitergehen.html
This overcomplication is based on a fallacy and won't work! We have to call a group what it calls itself i.e. Jews/Jewish - that's it basis (whether it has historical discrepancies with previous versions or not). Saying, oh most are brainwashed into fear of their powerful leaders and there are some who actually disagree blah blah blah - is a fallacy! They all belong to the same group and that's called "Jewish" - when we say "The Japaese bombed Pearl Harbour" we don't refer to every single Japanese person and their indivual opinion on this matter - that is a total fallacy! It is accetped to refer to a group by what it calls itself and it's chief belief and characteristic i.e Judaism. The only reason to not do this is because of fear of the consequences but that's not brave and it is not truthful. Call a thing what it actually is! If some members of that group don't like that idea then they can leave that group. This fear of speaking without a mealy mouth is a waste of time and plays into the hands of the deceivers - it is exactly what they want!
No. What really plays into the hands of the deceivers is confirming their lie that anti-Zionism equals anti-semitism by referring to "the Jews" rather than to Zionists or Jewish supremacists. It is as ridiculous to label all Jews supremacists as it is to regard all white people as white supremacists. But then, by your reckoning, if I don't like that association I should "leave" the white group. Not sure how I can do that...
I understand your perspective here, but I also understand Ftinking Badge's perspective as well.
As far as I can tell Judaism is a Kabbalistic occult society which, like all Kabbalistic occult societies, deceives most of its members about its goals. Such occult societies - whether freemasons, Ismailis, knights templar, theosophists, scientologists, etc. - are evil in philosophy, in intent, and always produce evil consequences. All these groups contain many members who have no idea what their group's real goals are - but the groups still direct all their members' actions in pursuit of those goals.
So Judaism is a problem - and anyone who chooses to self-identify as a Jew is - at least to some degree - part of the problem. It is that very act of identifying as a Jew which allows someone's actions to be influenced and directed by the group.
Despite all that - it is also correct to suggest that marching up a narrow path to attack a well-defended clifftop fortress is a dumb idea.
One thing that the enemy has cleverly done is to mix both race and religion into the same term. Is anyone descended from a Jew also a Jew? Or is a Jew someone who believes in the Jewish religion? Or is a Jew someone who particpates in the Jewish business/politics influence club? Clearly being born as the child of Jewish parents cannot be a fault (although it could correlate with indoctrination and subsequent bad behavior).
The above is just rambling really - I don't quite think your framing of a new definition of Zionism is sufficient, but I do agree that just saying "It's the Jews" doesn't work well either.
Yes but fear of being labelled and called names is dictating the agenda for you here. We have to care less about what they call us, and to be preapred to be called the worst things - when we do that rather than resort to fallacies then that's the only way the brainwashing will start to fail to work. As for 'supremacy' that IS a genuine part of Judaism - "the chosen ones!" - it has been reinforced again and again by every Jew I have ever met in every aspect of their lives and upbringing, good, bad or indifferent. It can be argued that supremacy IS Judaism. Hiding behind the label "Zionism" is trying to avoid being called 'anti-semitic' - it is very weak and will not work with 'expanded definitions'. As for leaving the group - if a group is not racial (Judaism is clearly not despite the claims of some - there is no Jewish DNA) then belonging to it is a choice. Jews can convert to Christ and be no longer Jewish. "White ethnicity" is a recent perjoritive label (mostly used again by the enemies of people with 'white skin' but ridiculously taken up by some of those 'white skinned' people as the only 'skin' (hehe) they have in the game) and 'white-ness' is mostly defined by what it is not and is very weak and meaningless as a cohesive group.
No, I am not "weak", thank you very much. Neither am I afraid of labels - I have already been branded "anti-semitic" for highlighting the zio-imperialist nature of the global criminocracy and the leading role of the Rothschilds. The truth of the matter is that I am opposed to these vile people because of what they have done, are doing and plan to do, rather than because of their belonging to a particular ethno/religious/cultural group and I think it is important to be clear about that. You are right that there is a supremacist element in the very idea of a "chosen" people, but individual Jewish people do not all embrace that conceit on a personal or political level. I know that from personal experience. Your insistence on a hyper-simplified picture is typical of the mindset that unfortunately dominates contemporary discourse. If you are looking for rants about "the Jews" you have come to the wrong place.
You may or not be weak but its the position you are putting forward which is weak and is going to fail. Ultimately we have to call out the Jews, as a group, on the evidence and on their behaviour as a group alone - the totality of what is done in that groups name. Calling it different names is part of the deception and their way of avoiding accountability. Were Jesus, Peter, Paul, etc "ranting about the Jews"? No, they were calling out boldly and clearly bad faith, bad action, bad intent on the group.
At the essence of it all, regardless of putting people in boxes, is the dark occult.
Until we understand that the dark occult use our ignorance of natural law against us, we will continue to have our arses handed to us.
They are ancient psychologists that are laughing at our ignorance.
Surely "dark occult" and "ancient psychologists" are even more vague 'boxes' than the ACTUAL group? Why are we so frightened of the Truth? Anyone who doesn't want to be in that group can leave it anytime - by staying there they agree with its actions in their name.
I rather think "natural law" is itself an invention of the occult. As a concept it is/was part of the enlightenment - which was itself an occult, Luciferian endeavor.
It goes hand in hand with Jewish occult philosophy of Nature as God (see Spinoza).
Prior to the enlightenment there was the concept of divine law - which is a much better concept because it cannot be corrupted.
The problem with natural law, which as initially advocated looked exactly like divine law which it was intended to replace, is that it is, by definition, derived by reason. The problem with that is that it is therefore changeable and hence corruptible - which is exactly by design.
Divine law is protected against change because it is revealed only once and not subject to change by man.
Because of all the good Jews that there are, we can't go around naming the Jews as evil. Therefore, we need some way to separate out the Babylonian/Canaanite blood drinkers from the Jews they use as a shill for their evil deeds. The use of the term Zionism is about as right-on as I've heard. What about all the anti-Zionist Jews, and the atheist Jews? They don't count?
It's the best I can do as a dividing line - not Jews per se but Zionism understood as Jewish supremacism using the "anti-semitism" smear to disqualify any opposition to that Jewish supremacism.
That's what Jesus's winnowing fork is for. To separate the wheat from the tares. The seed of the serpent from the seed of the woman.
Here you go: straight and to the point.
They have done a stellar job in hiding their origins — and creating myths to suit…
https://substack.com/home/post/p-158906810
Zionist is a term used to cover up the true core of this evil. Judaic Supremacist is a more accurate term. A Judaic Supremacist is (anyone of any race) who ascribes to the ethnocentrically racist belief that one tribe/ race/ group of people are "chosen" by "God" and are therefore superior to all other people.
When do we talk about the Vatican?
Hi, that's interesting, but I think the word "Zionism" is a semantic scam, which decision-makers or controllers or even the criminocracy use to confuse the issue.
This word was originally invented by Nathan Birnbaum, a member of the "Hibat Tsion" movement (or literally "affection for Zion" known as "The Lovers of Zion"), who advocated a return to the Land of Israel as a solution to anti-Semitism - a word also coined at the same time by another Jew, Moritz Steinschneidern, and which is also a semantic manipulation (Arabs are also Semites).
Let's not forget that this is happening in the heart of Europe at the end of the 19th century, and that the forces of money and the emergence of modern capitalism are becoming internationalized through banking and railways in particular (and thanks to Baron Edmond de Rothschild, the Jewish
Colonization Association and the Universal Israelite Alliance).
A few years later, Nathan Birnbaum, who had campaigned in favor of nascent Zionism and who thought that Zionism was the only solution to protect the Jewish people, would distance himself from it and prefer Orthodox Judaism; he would have a more cultural approach, totally detached from the geographical return to the Land of Israel, and would become very critical of it.
He would call the Zionists "idolaters," and I quote:
-"They have elevated to the rank of idols the noise of machines, the din of engines, the tumult of carriages and the cacophony of the Stock Exchange." Or again:
-"They are not aware that in their fight against murder, murder is a legitimate means in their eyes. They want to found their world on anarchy, debauchery, and delusions of grandeur."
And as for the Land of Israel, he was against the beliefs of secular Zionism and its nationalist conception.
We can clearly see that from the beginning, Zionism was already criticized by some Jews and that later other Zionist Jews would leave it.
We know the rest and what can be seen as a method of the global mafia is (and that's what's really important) that it was necessary to establish a (Jewish) nationalism in the Middle East. And this is all the more easily understood because the time was one of the dislocation of empires in favor of nationalist states.
The continuation of the Zionist scam then made its way. Moreover, if we look at Israelite nationalism, it did not deviate from the rules of covid ("vaccine", isolation, etc.) and also follows the global "trend" and launched its digital shekel.
The reality is that the criticism of Zionism is a ruse (just like anti-Semitism which can also be) to mask the ideology of domination. Criticizing Zionism is tantamount to criticizing a political and economic ideology (one cannot exist without the other), and certainly not Jews as a whole. It's a useful smokescreen.
'The true power remains hidden ' - exactly.
The hidden power is the occult (KNOWLEDGE)
There is the light occult and the dark occult. Knowledge used for good OR evil.
The new world order is built upon the principle of CARE.
Those who care enough will win and the dark occult has much more care at the moment.
The G in freemasonry stands for the GENERATING principle and CARE is the generator of ACTION!!!
The freedom movement does not CARE about action. It cares about individual micro issues and conspiracies which is why we're getting absolutely nowhere. We may have to endure unimaginable suffering before we realise.
If we don't start singing in unison about natural law and the REQUIREMENTS of freedom then we'll ALL SUFFER the karmic consequences of INACTION.
THAT'S HOW IT WORKS MY FRIENDS WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT.
Only the Jews, Zionists or not, that consider themselves as "Gods chosen people" are a problem for the world and themselves That ignorant tremendously idotic arrogance causes all the suffering in relation with Jews - for others and themselves. With that unfounded and anti-spiritual belief they exclude themselves from the human family and wonder why they are mistrusted and disliked by the rest of humanity.
The dark occult KNOW that karma and the law of consequence applies so they foolishly believe that they can avoid karmic consequences by getting the order followers to do their dirty work.
They are in a war against the creator and the applicable laws of nature.
After all, it is the order followers that commit the atrocities.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QgWIjqVWREM
Thanks for posting that information. I expect you are familiar with Mark Passio. He would agree with Walter Veith that the Truth is fragmented within many perspectives.Passio’s sales pitch is Natural Law, which is the middle Pilar in Freemasonry ( building 7 on 911). The ladder spiralling around the middle Pilar is as close as we can get to perfection with protection. I get good feedback from sharing this episode from Passio’s web casts. Scroll to 15min and start from there. He does 15 min housekeeping. Now I will read King James Demonology. I have discussed King James once today. Natural Law has its way.