9 Comments
тна Return to thread

Paradoxically, this is where the Globalists and the Anarcho-primitivists agree.

Expand full comment

What do you mean? Did you read the article properly?

Expand full comment

My comment was intended as a reply to Dollyboy.

Expand full comment

Oh, OK

Expand full comment

To use the "scout" metaphor, when we see a major agenda item being shared by the ruling class and supposedly anti-ruling class groups, it is a red flag. I am not drawing a conclusion, I am just looking at the facts. I don't have a "side."

Expand full comment

But it's not the same, is it? The ruling class are not anti-industrialist at all, just pretending to be in order to gain social license for their Fourth Industrial Revolution digital slave system agenda. This is one of the main points in the article, in fact.

Expand full comment

I didn't say that they were. But the ruling class and what you are calling anti-industrialists seem to share an end point goal of reducing the human population by (pick your number) say 95%. The ruling class is going to accomplish that goal by genocide and mass sterilization, how do anti-industrialists propose to get there? Might the two groups form a coalition over that shared goal? Given the mass betrayal of most "radicals" that we have witnessed in the last 3 years to the interests of the the Globalists, it doesn't seem far fetched to me. Just reference how the environmental movement has been coopted in the last 3 decades. And it is relevant to note that the environmental movement has long had a sinister Malthusian tendency, as in the popular book the "Population Bomb" by ruling class toady Paul Ehrlich.

Expand full comment

But the environmentalist movement has been co-opted into a pro-industrialist direction, not an anti-industrialist one!

Expand full comment

They have found a way to live with that cognitive dissonance. Therapy works!

Expand full comment