"Sufficient numbers will have to have realised what this world has turned into..." "We can help win them over by exposing the corruption of the system..."
Agreed ... and this explains why the criminocracy's current, avowed number one priority, is fighting "disinformation", "misinformation" and "malinformation" ... all three being but euphemisms for what any honest broker would call "the truth".
What you said about how the criminocracy see our way of life as poverty, backwardness and laziness and so on reminded me of the Normans versus the indigenous Britons (Celts and Anglo-Saxons, let's say) - the Normans were inherently just a bunch of violent, fascist barbarians - the British were a relatively peaceful, pagan bunch (they especially did a fair bit resisting the encroachment of the church in Rome, and retained their pre-Christian ways, although often by simply incorporating them into the new religion - this has a lot to do, IMO, with Rome's support for the Normans - much of the crusades, for example, were Norman-led). Put differently, the British had a clear, distinct and rich cultural identity, compared to the barbarian nature of the Normans - who of course became the aristocracy/criminocracy. So the Normans had to tell themselves, more than telling others, that they had 'culture' and that the natives were 'backward' - we still live with the legacy of this today of course, which is why the simple censorship of good old fashioned Anglo-Saxon expletives (taken from agrarian vernacular) continues - it is said (by the Establishment) that use of words like 'fuck' and 'shit' is a sign of 'vulgarity'. No, it's actually just very creative linguistic expression - given that language and cultural identity are inseparable, by censoring our language, they are censoring our cultural identity. This is all deliberate (see also wokism).
The Establishment in Britain are essentially the same 'cultural/social group' as the Normans. Of course now they can't call themselves that (they can't be an overt occupying force) so they manufacture all this 'nationalism' to try and get the native British to adopt the Normans' cultural identity and view of the country (as their possession). The 'royal family' are a big part of this. Unfortunately, too many of the British people have fallen for this. Partly of course because of the way history is taught in schools - they're taught the Establishment's narrative, not the true British narrative - which is that we were invaded and occupied in 1066 and it's been that way ever since. The Establishment's attitude towards us, after all, is exactly the same as the Normans - we are the 'other', we are the 'serfs', we are the irritating native population who won't stop complaining. This may no longer be 'racial' or 'genetic' (there are a lot of Ivanhoes in the country), but in terms of 'cultural identity' it is absolutely true.
One clear solution to all this - which you talk about of course - is 'education' (similar to 'exposure') - if the British people can be made to understand their true history, and, yes, see the Establishment themselves as fundamentally 'the other' and 'not British' (in the true meaning of the word), then their eyes will be open and they will suddenly understand the reason why they live in a neo-feudalist criminocracy. One cannot understand oneself, one's own identity, without understand the cultural and social history of that identity.
And this is indeed worldwide now as well, of course (America, for example, or those who control it, are simply an 'extension' of the Norman/post-Norman colonialist faction) - this minority group of barbarians have managed to retain control for all these centuries. All of the 'political systems' or 'economic systems' are simply about social control. Understanding true history is vitally important.
Normal people just want to live a good life, in security and contentment, with their family and friends and community. The only thing that has ever prevented that is that minority social group of monstrous psychopaths - the obvious solution to that is, well, clear. Messy, yes, but clear, also yes.
Of course we know this - and yes, our challenge is to educate the masses to also understand this. Because once they truly understand it, acting on it - i.e. resistance, defending - will be an automatic, instinctive reaction.
And then, perhaps, when enough men have died, we shall be free (to misquote from 'Gladiator' lol).
"Sufficient numbers will have to have realised what this world has turned into..." "We can help win them over by exposing the corruption of the system..."
Agreed ... and this explains why the criminocracy's current, avowed number one priority, is fighting "disinformation", "misinformation" and "malinformation" ... all three being but euphemisms for what any honest broker would call "the truth".
Exactly.
Divide et Impera
What you said about how the criminocracy see our way of life as poverty, backwardness and laziness and so on reminded me of the Normans versus the indigenous Britons (Celts and Anglo-Saxons, let's say) - the Normans were inherently just a bunch of violent, fascist barbarians - the British were a relatively peaceful, pagan bunch (they especially did a fair bit resisting the encroachment of the church in Rome, and retained their pre-Christian ways, although often by simply incorporating them into the new religion - this has a lot to do, IMO, with Rome's support for the Normans - much of the crusades, for example, were Norman-led). Put differently, the British had a clear, distinct and rich cultural identity, compared to the barbarian nature of the Normans - who of course became the aristocracy/criminocracy. So the Normans had to tell themselves, more than telling others, that they had 'culture' and that the natives were 'backward' - we still live with the legacy of this today of course, which is why the simple censorship of good old fashioned Anglo-Saxon expletives (taken from agrarian vernacular) continues - it is said (by the Establishment) that use of words like 'fuck' and 'shit' is a sign of 'vulgarity'. No, it's actually just very creative linguistic expression - given that language and cultural identity are inseparable, by censoring our language, they are censoring our cultural identity. This is all deliberate (see also wokism).
The Establishment in Britain are essentially the same 'cultural/social group' as the Normans. Of course now they can't call themselves that (they can't be an overt occupying force) so they manufacture all this 'nationalism' to try and get the native British to adopt the Normans' cultural identity and view of the country (as their possession). The 'royal family' are a big part of this. Unfortunately, too many of the British people have fallen for this. Partly of course because of the way history is taught in schools - they're taught the Establishment's narrative, not the true British narrative - which is that we were invaded and occupied in 1066 and it's been that way ever since. The Establishment's attitude towards us, after all, is exactly the same as the Normans - we are the 'other', we are the 'serfs', we are the irritating native population who won't stop complaining. This may no longer be 'racial' or 'genetic' (there are a lot of Ivanhoes in the country), but in terms of 'cultural identity' it is absolutely true.
One clear solution to all this - which you talk about of course - is 'education' (similar to 'exposure') - if the British people can be made to understand their true history, and, yes, see the Establishment themselves as fundamentally 'the other' and 'not British' (in the true meaning of the word), then their eyes will be open and they will suddenly understand the reason why they live in a neo-feudalist criminocracy. One cannot understand oneself, one's own identity, without understand the cultural and social history of that identity.
And this is indeed worldwide now as well, of course (America, for example, or those who control it, are simply an 'extension' of the Norman/post-Norman colonialist faction) - this minority group of barbarians have managed to retain control for all these centuries. All of the 'political systems' or 'economic systems' are simply about social control. Understanding true history is vitally important.
Normal people just want to live a good life, in security and contentment, with their family and friends and community. The only thing that has ever prevented that is that minority social group of monstrous psychopaths - the obvious solution to that is, well, clear. Messy, yes, but clear, also yes.
Of course we know this - and yes, our challenge is to educate the masses to also understand this. Because once they truly understand it, acting on it - i.e. resistance, defending - will be an automatic, instinctive reaction.
And then, perhaps, when enough men have died, we shall be free (to misquote from 'Gladiator' lol).
YES!!!
A Canadian Grandma