You speak of the short, medium and long-term financial advantages, all of which are well-explained. While it's outside the scope of your post, I'd like to point out for the benefit of your readers who might not be aware, that the biggest financial shenanigan BY FAR of The Great Reset / Scamdemic was in fact the Going-Direct Reset. John Titus: “To be clear, the Fed absolutely needed the 24/7 hype over the alleged pandemic as superficial justification for its massive $3 trillion balance sheet expansion, which in turn created $3 trillion of new money in private hands—exactly as BlackRock’s plan called for. Without the saturation air cover that the Fed had, its acts would’ve amounted to a naked money grab, which as it was even Jim “Mad Money” Cramer called one of the greatest wealth transfers in history."
“...Nathaniel, (pictured) “may become the richest Rothschild of them all” thanks to “bold bets in this era’s new-money investment vehicles” and the family’s traditional geopolitical foresight. — Of course, we know that “ traditional geopolitical foresight” could easily be replaced by “geo-puppetry”. This euphemistic bit had me grinning ear to ear.
“All such showcase events, including most so-called “revolutions” and so-called terrorist attacks like 9/11, are, in my view, merely “shock and awe” operations designed to push traumatised populations further into the prison-camp society favoured by the criminocrats.” — I'm not sure the “in my view” qualifier is necessary at this point. To those paying attention and those who make a study of such events, the evidence is overwhelming that what you state is very much the case.
Suffragette co-optation … how interesting. I did not know that.
“The reality is, of course, very different. It is that control of our national and international institutions, as well as of the entire industrial-financial system, has fallen, by foul means, into the hands of a veritable mafia.” — Here's a poetic play on Big Gov / Big Biz as the ultimate Cosa Nostra ... https://redpillpoems.substack.com/p/la-loro-cosa
I apologize in advance for bringing our string of concurrence to an end. You were safely en route when you said “Greed brings out the WORST in people” … then you hit the ditch.
With all due respect, the notion that money is the "main problem we face in this life", is not one I agree with. At all. The lack of money that some people experience is OFTEN a problem. The super-concentration of it in the hands of very few (as is currently the case), is ALWAYS a problem. Likewise, the monopolization/concentration of its issuance and distribution is ALWAYS a problem. Money itself is NEVER the problem, any more than knives are a problem because people get stabbed to death. Any more than water is a problem because people die in floods.
"Money is the root of all evil" is a platitude of the worst kind. It is both fallacious and the result of shallow thinking. It denies human agency and excuses poor behaviour; our behaviour, human behaviour. "Greed is the root of all evil" would be much closer to the truth. Greed is the problem. Greed is a cancer; a spiritual cancer. If instead of “is … MONEY” you had written “is … GREED”, I would have concurred. The conflation of money and greed is not one I will ever go along with. I'll leave you with this poem:
"I have lately been almost inundated with people who respond to a comment with a concrete misunderstanding and rejection of what I said" — Clearly, there's a pattern. Clearly, you are being misunderstood. Assuming this is not deliberate imprecision on your part, write so that you are not misunderstood, or at least less likely to be so.
If I was a mind reader, or if I knew you, or if I had visual clues, or ... we might easily not have had this needless back and forth, being as we were in agreement. But all we have are words to go by, so herd your words with care.
I try to be very careful with my words. If you are more careful with yours you won't be needlessly wasting your time nor the time of others.
"Y’know, all you have to do is ASK if that’s what someone means" — Wrong! People are not interviewing you. It's up to you to say things clearly.
Simply put, unless attention and/or wasting people's time is what you seek, express yourself more clearly. That's what your "Activity" is trying to tell you.
I'm sorry you took my response as some sort of personal attack or put down. It was nothing of the sort. The only people I look down on are people who deserve to be looked down upon by their actions. I look down on people who do evil things.
I was making a point, which I thought was valid; a distinction I thought was worthy of making since it's so commonly missed.
I assumed, perhaps wrongly, that guests on a stack such as this were above assuming base motives.
I did not crash your thread, you crashed mine. If someone responds to a comment I make I always read their comment, and if need be, respond to it ... PRECISELY because I respect them, see them as equals, and think them worthy of me spending time responding, just as they thought me worthy of their posting a response.
I seek dialogue, not drama or confrontation. If you cannot tolerate disagreement, I would suggest not piggy-backing my thread.
I'm sorry you took my response as some sort of snotty-ness, none was intended.
PS: Nowhere in your original post is "THE LOVE OF MONEY" mentioned. Clearly, if you'd written that instead of "MONEY", we wouldn't be wasting our time. Unfortunately I'm not a mind reader.
Thank you again, PAUL! Bracing to see the criminals' history set forth in such plain terms! 'The Financiers behind " '9/11' "is third section in JIM HOFFMAN's and my Waking Up from Our Nightmare book, and it touches on a the profiteering from Wars that you get into here. With " 'COVID-19' " now so clear a crime of mass-murder after ' '9/11' ", let's indeed work to turn awareness into revolution. Yesterday's Post was a song with links to the San Diego Citizens' Grand Jury. https://donpaul.substack.com/p/911-is-a-big-lie
As ever thanks for this illuminating and challenging analysis. I am close to finding its sweep irresistible. I am troubled, perchance because of my past, by your depiction of the post-war 'new normals' as controlled completely by the criminocracy. Converted to Marxism in the early 1970s but always at odds with the Central Committee it was the early 19990s before I fled from its authoritarianism and determinism. Yet I'm conscious that even now I speak of the post-WW2 social democratic consensus, of a certain accommodation between Capital and Labour created by pressure from below. Perhaps I do so because I was born in 1947 and reaped some of the rewards of that temporary agreement. Am I being naive in holding on to a notion that, however limited, working class agency was of consequence in the criminocracy's weighing up of what was best for them in the days following the Second World War?
Always a pleasure to read or listen to these brilliant and well informed writings.
The criminocracy whitewashes their leading players by bestowing prestigious awards on them - The Nobel for peace was one and now there's another.
Remember Melbourne?
Dictator Dan Andrews has just been awarded the Order of Australala - not that the award ever meant anything the point here is the whitewashing of empires puppets who've deliberately gone out of their way knowingly caused massive amounts of harm to other people.
Despite the great reset, population growth has not peaked. However, we just don't know if some barbaric off-the-wall event will trigger a tsunami of titanic proportions and takes the world down the rabbit hole.
Great piece. Truly, all wars are bankers' wars.
You speak of the short, medium and long-term financial advantages, all of which are well-explained. While it's outside the scope of your post, I'd like to point out for the benefit of your readers who might not be aware, that the biggest financial shenanigan BY FAR of The Great Reset / Scamdemic was in fact the Going-Direct Reset. John Titus: “To be clear, the Fed absolutely needed the 24/7 hype over the alleged pandemic as superficial justification for its massive $3 trillion balance sheet expansion, which in turn created $3 trillion of new money in private hands—exactly as BlackRock’s plan called for. Without the saturation air cover that the Fed had, its acts would’ve amounted to a naked money grab, which as it was even Jim “Mad Money” Cramer called one of the greatest wealth transfers in history."
“...Nathaniel, (pictured) “may become the richest Rothschild of them all” thanks to “bold bets in this era’s new-money investment vehicles” and the family’s traditional geopolitical foresight. — Of course, we know that “ traditional geopolitical foresight” could easily be replaced by “geo-puppetry”. This euphemistic bit had me grinning ear to ear.
“All such showcase events, including most so-called “revolutions” and so-called terrorist attacks like 9/11, are, in my view, merely “shock and awe” operations designed to push traumatised populations further into the prison-camp society favoured by the criminocrats.” — I'm not sure the “in my view” qualifier is necessary at this point. To those paying attention and those who make a study of such events, the evidence is overwhelming that what you state is very much the case.
Suffragette co-optation … how interesting. I did not know that.
“The reality is, of course, very different. It is that control of our national and international institutions, as well as of the entire industrial-financial system, has fallen, by foul means, into the hands of a veritable mafia.” — Here's a poetic play on Big Gov / Big Biz as the ultimate Cosa Nostra ... https://redpillpoems.substack.com/p/la-loro-cosa
I apologize in advance for bringing our string of concurrence to an end. You were safely en route when you said “Greed brings out the WORST in people” … then you hit the ditch.
With all due respect, the notion that money is the "main problem we face in this life", is not one I agree with. At all. The lack of money that some people experience is OFTEN a problem. The super-concentration of it in the hands of very few (as is currently the case), is ALWAYS a problem. Likewise, the monopolization/concentration of its issuance and distribution is ALWAYS a problem. Money itself is NEVER the problem, any more than knives are a problem because people get stabbed to death. Any more than water is a problem because people die in floods.
"Money is the root of all evil" is a platitude of the worst kind. It is both fallacious and the result of shallow thinking. It denies human agency and excuses poor behaviour; our behaviour, human behaviour. "Greed is the root of all evil" would be much closer to the truth. Greed is the problem. Greed is a cancer; a spiritual cancer. If instead of “is … MONEY” you had written “is … GREED”, I would have concurred. The conflation of money and greed is not one I will ever go along with. I'll leave you with this poem:
Like envy and hate
greed is a fever that takes
over the soul
darkens the heart and poisons the mind
crowding out kindness and reason
clouding our judgment leaving us blind
and numb and dumb and deaf
to the faint cries of fairness
and the pernicious effects
of false accounting.
"I have lately been almost inundated with people who respond to a comment with a concrete misunderstanding and rejection of what I said" — Clearly, there's a pattern. Clearly, you are being misunderstood. Assuming this is not deliberate imprecision on your part, write so that you are not misunderstood, or at least less likely to be so.
If I was a mind reader, or if I knew you, or if I had visual clues, or ... we might easily not have had this needless back and forth, being as we were in agreement. But all we have are words to go by, so herd your words with care.
I try to be very careful with my words. If you are more careful with yours you won't be needlessly wasting your time nor the time of others.
"Y’know, all you have to do is ASK if that’s what someone means" — Wrong! People are not interviewing you. It's up to you to say things clearly.
Simply put, unless attention and/or wasting people's time is what you seek, express yourself more clearly. That's what your "Activity" is trying to tell you.
Peace!
I'm sorry you took my response as some sort of personal attack or put down. It was nothing of the sort. The only people I look down on are people who deserve to be looked down upon by their actions. I look down on people who do evil things.
I was making a point, which I thought was valid; a distinction I thought was worthy of making since it's so commonly missed.
I assumed, perhaps wrongly, that guests on a stack such as this were above assuming base motives.
I did not crash your thread, you crashed mine. If someone responds to a comment I make I always read their comment, and if need be, respond to it ... PRECISELY because I respect them, see them as equals, and think them worthy of me spending time responding, just as they thought me worthy of their posting a response.
I seek dialogue, not drama or confrontation. If you cannot tolerate disagreement, I would suggest not piggy-backing my thread.
I'm sorry you took my response as some sort of snotty-ness, none was intended.
PS: Nowhere in your original post is "THE LOVE OF MONEY" mentioned. Clearly, if you'd written that instead of "MONEY", we wouldn't be wasting our time. Unfortunately I'm not a mind reader.
Thank you again, PAUL! Bracing to see the criminals' history set forth in such plain terms! 'The Financiers behind " '9/11' "is third section in JIM HOFFMAN's and my Waking Up from Our Nightmare book, and it touches on a the profiteering from Wars that you get into here. With " 'COVID-19' " now so clear a crime of mass-murder after ' '9/11' ", let's indeed work to turn awareness into revolution. Yesterday's Post was a song with links to the San Diego Citizens' Grand Jury. https://donpaul.substack.com/p/911-is-a-big-lie
As ever thanks for this illuminating and challenging analysis. I am close to finding its sweep irresistible. I am troubled, perchance because of my past, by your depiction of the post-war 'new normals' as controlled completely by the criminocracy. Converted to Marxism in the early 1970s but always at odds with the Central Committee it was the early 19990s before I fled from its authoritarianism and determinism. Yet I'm conscious that even now I speak of the post-WW2 social democratic consensus, of a certain accommodation between Capital and Labour created by pressure from below. Perhaps I do so because I was born in 1947 and reaped some of the rewards of that temporary agreement. Am I being naive in holding on to a notion that, however limited, working class agency was of consequence in the criminocracy's weighing up of what was best for them in the days following the Second World War?
Best wishes and solidarity
Tony Taylor
Always a pleasure to read or listen to these brilliant and well informed writings.
The criminocracy whitewashes their leading players by bestowing prestigious awards on them - The Nobel for peace was one and now there's another.
Remember Melbourne?
Dictator Dan Andrews has just been awarded the Order of Australala - not that the award ever meant anything the point here is the whitewashing of empires puppets who've deliberately gone out of their way knowingly caused massive amounts of harm to other people.
I write songs along these lines and I agree entirely with what you’re saying Paul.
Expose and resist
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mmAhPm8deMs&pp=ygUfTW9jayB0aGUgc2V0IHVwIHRodW1ibmFpbCBncmVlbg%3D%3D
https://open.substack.com/pub/thumbnailgreen/p/on-a-watch-list?r=nv8me&utm_medium=ios
https://thejews.substack.com/p/my-awakening-to-the-jewish-question
Despite the great reset, population growth has not peaked. However, we just don't know if some barbaric off-the-wall event will trigger a tsunami of titanic proportions and takes the world down the rabbit hole.