I've felt the same blindness decades ago. I thought that I might have deluded myself in seeing a bleak future.
It wasn't until con-vid that I started to give myself credit, but the future doesn't seem so bleak now that a lot more are questioning things that used to be no go zones.
I'm with you about the coup "in which we are to be herded into smart prisons under the false flag of fighting climate change" as long as you make clear a very important point, that the climate crisis (forget "change") is real. The evil figures behind our technocratic enslavement have shown themselves perfectly capable of using any issue to spread fear and cement their authority among the populace. Meanwhile, scientists in the '70s working for Exxon were fired for showing that petrochemicals destroy the environment. I could go on with facts and figures and observations of what's happening around the world but if one needs to see a hoax under every rock -- well, one will
There is no one single "they". Scientists at Exxon were showing an unsustainable toxic future coming directly from their company's products. This was published. Then came the muzzling, they were fired and Exxon and the rest of the oil industry hired bought and sold mouthpieces masquerading as the "scientists" you've been listening to. The Time Magazine'article means nothing. Just a way at that moment to sell copies of their magazine. As for depending on things like "a warm period in the 1940s," that's embarrassing, the planet's weather systems are complex, their feedback loops changing all the time. Meanwhile a banquet of poisons on which we are stuffing ourselves while the world goes belly up includes much else besides CO2. Look at the Siberian tundra with holes opening wider and wider each year allowing methane to escape. You can't deny this or take refuge in some YouTube "channel that goes well" with your preconceptions. But YOU SKIPPED OVER my main point -- Schwab, Bill Gates, Harari and the rest of the criminals don't care whether the climate crisis is real or not. They will make use of it either way!
Yes, Firstenberg's The Invisible Rainbow is great. I hope it has a wide audience. My main point in my comment was that the evil figurines threatening us will use a climate crisis for their own nefarious ends, whether or not it is real. To them it makes no difference! Their modus operandi remains the same -- enslave us through fear
Thanks for the book!
I've felt the same blindness decades ago. I thought that I might have deluded myself in seeing a bleak future.
It wasn't until con-vid that I started to give myself credit, but the future doesn't seem so bleak now that a lot more are questioning things that used to be no go zones.
I'm with you about the coup "in which we are to be herded into smart prisons under the false flag of fighting climate change" as long as you make clear a very important point, that the climate crisis (forget "change") is real. The evil figures behind our technocratic enslavement have shown themselves perfectly capable of using any issue to spread fear and cement their authority among the populace. Meanwhile, scientists in the '70s working for Exxon were fired for showing that petrochemicals destroy the environment. I could go on with facts and figures and observations of what's happening around the world but if one needs to see a hoax under every rock -- well, one will
In the 70s they were warning of an ice age. It was on the front cover of time magazine!
In the 90s they started cherry picking data to hide a recent very warm period in the 1940s.
Carbon dioxide was to blame.
Ever wonder why they are obsessed with reducing co2, but are cool with mining for rare earth metals?
I'm against pollution. Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant.
Here's a channel that goes into it well.
https://youtu.be/n-W76C0kkwc
There is no one single "they". Scientists at Exxon were showing an unsustainable toxic future coming directly from their company's products. This was published. Then came the muzzling, they were fired and Exxon and the rest of the oil industry hired bought and sold mouthpieces masquerading as the "scientists" you've been listening to. The Time Magazine'article means nothing. Just a way at that moment to sell copies of their magazine. As for depending on things like "a warm period in the 1940s," that's embarrassing, the planet's weather systems are complex, their feedback loops changing all the time. Meanwhile a banquet of poisons on which we are stuffing ourselves while the world goes belly up includes much else besides CO2. Look at the Siberian tundra with holes opening wider and wider each year allowing methane to escape. You can't deny this or take refuge in some YouTube "channel that goes well" with your preconceptions. But YOU SKIPPED OVER my main point -- Schwab, Bill Gates, Harari and the rest of the criminals don't care whether the climate crisis is real or not. They will make use of it either way!
Yes, Firstenberg's The Invisible Rainbow is great. I hope it has a wide audience. My main point in my comment was that the evil figurines threatening us will use a climate crisis for their own nefarious ends, whether or not it is real. To them it makes no difference! Their modus operandi remains the same -- enslave us through fear