Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Charlotte Ruse's avatar

A parasitic criminal mafia whose sadistic pyschopathy is unable to hinder the stupidity of killing its host. 😁

Expand full comment
Pat Cusack's avatar

I can prove your “Criminocratic Predators” are indeed criminals. They condemn themselves by their own words, which provide first-hand evidence of deliberate accounting fraud [my words, not a legal opinion].

I've publicly analysed this damning evidence of accounting fraud, taken directly from bank loan accounts statements [i.e., their own words] provided by three individual bank customers (who, understandably, wish to remain anonymous). As I haven't yet published a book on this subject, my Substack [https://patcusack.substack.com/] will have to do for now.

Fair warning: be prepared to learn 6 basic rules of accounting, so you can see through the deceptive "wording" printed in these bank statements. Banks use a deceitful “word overlay” to distract from correct accounting numbers, and this explains why government regulators have yet to even detect this crime. The crime [deception] is not in their numbers; it’s in their words. And bank regulators only ever see consolidated bank Balance Sheets or Profit & Loss Statements - which truthfully aggregate the NUMBERS from these “loan account statements”; the false WORDS are only ever seen by the deceived customer, who is as likely to be unaware of the rules of accounting as you or I.

My entire Substack consists of just 6 articles, 3 of which [#2, 3 & 5] explore the evidence from three different Australian banks. If you only have 5 minutes, my “Welcome” article should give you incentive to follow where the evidence leads.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts