In other words: "Accuse the other of that you are guilty."
Joseph Goebbels
So if you're sickened by the systematic slaughter of indigenous populations, view the sustainability agenda as a scam, and are "for" bodily autonomy then you must be a right-wing antisemitic fascist.
“The “anti-semitic” smears have become increasingly far-fetched in recent years.” — Indeed. They were already ridiculous BEFORE the latest Gaza hyper-mowing atrocities. And of course, reductio ad hitlerum has been a thing since forever (the 1950's). Currently, the “anti-semitic”, “Nazi” and “Hitler” smears, have ALL been reduced to meaningless, ludicrous absurdities. The only thing they now signal is the utter intellectual bankruptcy of anyone using them.
“And any challenging of general official agendas is now likely to be met with the same hysterical response,” — Precisely … when no logical cogent response is possible, all one's left with is hysteria and ad hominem attacks.
“Given that the authors of the document would no doubt argue that this assumption is anti-semitic, why do they themselves make it?” — BINGO! Hoisted on their own projection petard.
“The louder the propagandists shout that talking about the global criminocracy is anti-semitic, the clearer the reality becomes.” — Key insight.
The global criminocracy sure seems thoroughly Zionist to me. To be logically critical of Zionism must be (so-called) “antisemitism”. Therefore, in order to support the global criminocracy, one must be pro-Zionism and pro-semitic. Did I figure that out correctly?
In other words: "Accuse the other of that you are guilty."
Joseph Goebbels
So if you're sickened by the systematic slaughter of indigenous populations, view the sustainability agenda as a scam, and are "for" bodily autonomy then you must be a right-wing antisemitic fascist.
Double bull's-eye!
“The “anti-semitic” smears have become increasingly far-fetched in recent years.” — Indeed. They were already ridiculous BEFORE the latest Gaza hyper-mowing atrocities. And of course, reductio ad hitlerum has been a thing since forever (the 1950's). Currently, the “anti-semitic”, “Nazi” and “Hitler” smears, have ALL been reduced to meaningless, ludicrous absurdities. The only thing they now signal is the utter intellectual bankruptcy of anyone using them.
“And any challenging of general official agendas is now likely to be met with the same hysterical response,” — Precisely … when no logical cogent response is possible, all one's left with is hysteria and ad hominem attacks.
“Given that the authors of the document would no doubt argue that this assumption is anti-semitic, why do they themselves make it?” — BINGO! Hoisted on their own projection petard.
“The louder the propagandists shout that talking about the global criminocracy is anti-semitic, the clearer the reality becomes.” — Key insight.
Jordan's oil painting is a perfect encapsulation.
The global criminocracy sure seems thoroughly Zionist to me. To be logically critical of Zionism must be (so-called) “antisemitism”. Therefore, in order to support the global criminocracy, one must be pro-Zionism and pro-semitic. Did I figure that out correctly?
You’re saying that the Zionists are the scapegoats of the monarchies?
Sure. What’s your explanation?