Last month I spent some time back in England, where I spoke at the launch of the short documentary film ‘Spirit of the Downs’ in Sussex, which can be viewed here, and at an event organised by the Real Left in London, the audio recording of which can be found
Excellent research Paul. Many thanks (I was ordained CofE priest 1983) In addition CofE commitment to ‘net zero’ carbon emissions is anti life. And CofE had among fiercest lockdowns in the UK which resulted in 25% of membership disappearing. Malthusian logic of course. To be net zero the fastest way is to lose people and slough off parish churches to conservation trusts. Welby is deeply anti parish tho parishes are oldest institutions in England predating the English State! Church Commisioners use land stolen from minus and peasants to promote / sponsor dark capitalism. In late 20C they build 8 super shopping malls - cathedrals to consumerism and arguably luciferan - from Newcastle to Ashford.
"Church of England, so keen to apologise for its past involvement with exploitative slave-traders, is in fact in bed with their present-day equivalents in the neo-colonial impact investment business, who regard today’s children across the world as mere “human capital” to feed their sustainable prosperity."
My antenna immediately shot up when it was mentioned that two of the philanthropic projects that interested the "Agenda 2030 sadistic parasites" involved vulnerable women and children. Regrettably, if you're a vulnerable woman or a young child who is swept up into one of these benevolent sounding charities you could find yourself in a horrific situation.
"Remember, the Associated Press (AP) investigation in 2017 revealing that more than 100 United Nations (UN) peacekeepers ran a child sex ring in Haiti over a 10-year period and none were ever jailed. The report further found that over the previous 12 years, there had been almost 2,000 allegations of sexual abuse and exploitation by peacekeepers and other UN personnel around the world."
As you know, I have a different attitude towards religion than most Leftist anarchists, due in significant part to the fact that my experiences growing up in a Mennonite church were very positive, and the tradition of which I consider myself a part was very much a counter-hegemonic political movement as well as a religious movement.
That said, I hope that I never come across as an apologist for the many crimes committed in the name of Christianity. Spiritual abuse is definitely real, and there's something particularly horrible about abuse committed by someone who is supposed to be caring for your spiritual well being, because it's an abuse of trust on the most fundamental level imaginable.
Very quickly, I'd like to explain why I don't focus on the historic crimes committed in the name of religion (although I'm glad you do!)
The way I see it, the globalists now use "the Science" to run ideological cover for their evil deeds, not religion, and the MSM likes to dunk on religion because it needs something to portray badly in order to make itself look enlightened by comparison.
Try searching on Netflix for a positive portrayal of Christianity. You're a lot likelier to get stuff that makes Christianity look super-creepy. The series about the Branch Davidians murdered at Waco come to mind.
For instance, Catholic priests are widely reviled for being pedophiles, and I should state very clearly that I think the whole idea of having celibate priests is a terrible idea, and I oppose it.
However, which is worse? Molesting kids or mutilating their bodies?
I think any reasonable person will agree that doing permanent physical damage to a child's body is worse than doing psychological damage.
I know lots of people with lots of sexual trauma who have gone on to live full, inspiring lives.
I hope that the victims of these so-called "doctors" will live healthy, fulfilling lives, but let's face it - it'll be years before the data is in on this twisted science experiment.
I don't know about you, but I'm not optimistic. But we can hope.
Did you see Laura Dodsworth's work on de-transitioners? Super poignant stuff.
The Christianity you appreciate has little in common with the Church of England, which is about as much of a 'counter-hegemonic political movement' as the World Bank! No, haven't seen that work by Laura Dodsworth. Thanks for the recommendation.
Staggering...Thanks for this. I wonder if Alison McDowell is aware of this. She has been tracking for years what is or resembles such "impact" investing in the US. Perhaps you want to send her a link to this article. To be honest, I no longer am in contact with her, I found her difficult personally, but then again nobody's perfect
Doesn't the Church of England realize that the Sustainability goals are Marxist traps? Doesn't it know that by joining in the WEF's targets, it's going to be enslaving its children to the devil in Luxembourg?
If not, then it seems fitting that the church that was founded so a Catholic King could divorce his wife is going to be the one that enslaves a new generation of people that won't even have Christianity to fall back on because one of the goals is to remove religion.
The UNSDG agenda is not directly "Marxist", as some claim, but is nevertheless a similar device which has been manufactured to disguise the sustainable "development" of the private wealth and power of a gang of industrialist crooks as a force for "good". On this basis, anyone who opposes either Marxism or the UNSDGs can be vilified as "reactionary", "right-wing", etc etc. The Church of England is acting as yet another virtue-signalling PR agency for the global criminocracy.
Excellent research Paul. Many thanks (I was ordained CofE priest 1983) In addition CofE commitment to ‘net zero’ carbon emissions is anti life. And CofE had among fiercest lockdowns in the UK which resulted in 25% of membership disappearing. Malthusian logic of course. To be net zero the fastest way is to lose people and slough off parish churches to conservation trusts. Welby is deeply anti parish tho parishes are oldest institutions in England predating the English State! Church Commisioners use land stolen from minus and peasants to promote / sponsor dark capitalism. In late 20C they build 8 super shopping malls - cathedrals to consumerism and arguably luciferan - from Newcastle to Ashford.
"Church of England, so keen to apologise for its past involvement with exploitative slave-traders, is in fact in bed with their present-day equivalents in the neo-colonial impact investment business, who regard today’s children across the world as mere “human capital” to feed their sustainable prosperity."
My antenna immediately shot up when it was mentioned that two of the philanthropic projects that interested the "Agenda 2030 sadistic parasites" involved vulnerable women and children. Regrettably, if you're a vulnerable woman or a young child who is swept up into one of these benevolent sounding charities you could find yourself in a horrific situation.
"Remember, the Associated Press (AP) investigation in 2017 revealing that more than 100 United Nations (UN) peacekeepers ran a child sex ring in Haiti over a 10-year period and none were ever jailed. The report further found that over the previous 12 years, there had been almost 2,000 allegations of sexual abuse and exploitation by peacekeepers and other UN personnel around the world."
This was probaby just the tip of the iceberg.😒
Nowhere do the ESG or Impact investing crowd talk about having less and that maybe being a billionaire or uber wealthy is anti humanity.
Like the Spanish minister who rode a bicycle for 100 meters after taking a private jet everything is about image and optics.
I prefer the straight up greedy capitalists: what you see is what you get.
Very important work!
As you know, I have a different attitude towards religion than most Leftist anarchists, due in significant part to the fact that my experiences growing up in a Mennonite church were very positive, and the tradition of which I consider myself a part was very much a counter-hegemonic political movement as well as a religious movement.
That said, I hope that I never come across as an apologist for the many crimes committed in the name of Christianity. Spiritual abuse is definitely real, and there's something particularly horrible about abuse committed by someone who is supposed to be caring for your spiritual well being, because it's an abuse of trust on the most fundamental level imaginable.
Very quickly, I'd like to explain why I don't focus on the historic crimes committed in the name of religion (although I'm glad you do!)
The way I see it, the globalists now use "the Science" to run ideological cover for their evil deeds, not religion, and the MSM likes to dunk on religion because it needs something to portray badly in order to make itself look enlightened by comparison.
Try searching on Netflix for a positive portrayal of Christianity. You're a lot likelier to get stuff that makes Christianity look super-creepy. The series about the Branch Davidians murdered at Waco come to mind.
For instance, Catholic priests are widely reviled for being pedophiles, and I should state very clearly that I think the whole idea of having celibate priests is a terrible idea, and I oppose it.
However, which is worse? Molesting kids or mutilating their bodies?
I think any reasonable person will agree that doing permanent physical damage to a child's body is worse than doing psychological damage.
I know lots of people with lots of sexual trauma who have gone on to live full, inspiring lives.
I hope that the victims of these so-called "doctors" will live healthy, fulfilling lives, but let's face it - it'll be years before the data is in on this twisted science experiment.
I don't know about you, but I'm not optimistic. But we can hope.
Did you see Laura Dodsworth's work on de-transitioners? Super poignant stuff.
The Christianity you appreciate has little in common with the Church of England, which is about as much of a 'counter-hegemonic political movement' as the World Bank! No, haven't seen that work by Laura Dodsworth. Thanks for the recommendation.
Check out Laura's work here: https://issuu.com/derosnec/docs/laura_dodsworth____the_detransitioners____the_sund
Staggering...Thanks for this. I wonder if Alison McDowell is aware of this. She has been tracking for years what is or resembles such "impact" investing in the US. Perhaps you want to send her a link to this article. To be honest, I no longer am in contact with her, I found her difficult personally, but then again nobody's perfect
I'm not in touch with her now, either, although I remain very grateful for her work, which enabled me to get my head around the impact racket.
Doesn't the Church of England realize that the Sustainability goals are Marxist traps? Doesn't it know that by joining in the WEF's targets, it's going to be enslaving its children to the devil in Luxembourg?
If not, then it seems fitting that the church that was founded so a Catholic King could divorce his wife is going to be the one that enslaves a new generation of people that won't even have Christianity to fall back on because one of the goals is to remove religion.
The UNSDG agenda is not directly "Marxist", as some claim, but is nevertheless a similar device which has been manufactured to disguise the sustainable "development" of the private wealth and power of a gang of industrialist crooks as a force for "good". On this basis, anyone who opposes either Marxism or the UNSDGs can be vilified as "reactionary", "right-wing", etc etc. The Church of England is acting as yet another virtue-signalling PR agency for the global criminocracy.