This is still up. https://budbromley.blog/2022/02/17/dr-robert-malone-in-hawaii-in-talk-story-with-children/ See what it tells you about Dr. Malone and his Dr. wife. In the end he is still promoting vaxxes. I believe the only thing to say to kids asking about vaxxination is to run as fast as possible in the opposite direction to anyone promoting the killer jabs. Out of respect they call him Uncle, turns my stomach to hear that.
Thanks for posting that. Yeah, it's really gross watching the kids place their trust in him as a "caring adult figure". And isn't it weird how his wife acts throughout? It's almost like she is helping to "handle" him in the situation. "Let me ask you a question, do you want the vaccine?" That's not appropriate. What a jerk.
Too bad he didn't promote science and the arts of farming like he claims too.
I think vaxxxinations ought to be illegal, at this point. Like murder still is? Unless your name is Malone, gates, or Biden, Nuland, Sullivan, Blinken, Fauci.
Then you got free reign to kill as many as you can...
I just watched the video...I really don't hear them supporting the injections. They actually directly said to that boy who asked whether he should have it, that they didn't think he should. They were also actively encouraging the children to trust their own natural immunity. Is there something I am missing?
Given that these jabs are the deadliest genocide in human history, and given that Dr. Malone knows that all too well, as he claims to have invented the technology, I find the uplifting and comforting tone of the conversation to be more than simply disengenious and patronizing. If he had said, avoid this jab at all costs, no matter what, no human needs them whatsoever, they may kill you or maim you, I would cut him some slack. Mayble Malone is ok with genocide, or feels its needed? If he was as injured as he claims to be from his own alleged jabs, he would be speaking much more clearly about the whole matter. He is insideous, this is clear to me. Most kids who got a real jab will be sterile if they live long enough to find out.
I get it. I just think the way he (they both) spoke was completely appropriate considering their immediate audience. Do you really think there is any value is scaring the life out of these kids? It is a lot for even a grown, mature adult to handle...existentially speaking. A calm approach is also much more easily digested by people, especially a varied audience watching it more broadly across the Internet. I actually think it is a great video that could be shared for other kids to watch because it is so calm.
I am disappointed the events of the last few years haven't opened people's eyes to the harm done to children from vaccines for decades. People don't seem to make the connection. Even people who see the greed of Big Pharma in this, seem to think it is a new thing, and don't realise that the damage and lies have been happening since the introduction of vaccines. So I absolutely understand the frustration and wanting people to get angry and more definitive. I just don't think that is the way to get people to listen, especially kids.
I wonder what the kids who have been killed or maimed would think of the video?....I have a feeling they would find it as disturbing as I do. Talking calmly about genocide....being reasonable about murder. Malone knows full well what the jabs do, through his research and his own experience.
Does Malone represent a "Plan B" for global capitalism? That is, if the Liberal version fails, the Conservative version kicks in? That way they keep the pendulum of the Left/Right theater going?
I stopped reading Malone after about the fifth post he wrote about his wife and his farm and his travels, in which process of reading I felt like a total loser, like I am unworthy of reading such fabulous wisdom from such an accomplished man, who actually created RNA and DNA, not the great spirit God....
I have found him "sketchy as all get out" since finding him online back in 2020. He is everywhere and he has his hands in everything. I have watched him talk about "A" as though he were in favor of it when in fact he is actually representing "B" by using careful language and by positioning himself carefully. If you listen to him talk to the children in a video made in Hawaii in 2020, about the "vaccine" verses the "virus", it is very clear what is going on there. The man is not here to help. That's my personal opinion. I don't trust him as far as I could throw him AND his grandma. (sorry grandma, you are probably cool, it's not your fault).
Gandhi encouraged the Indian population to boycott imported clothing because he saw that millions of people would lose purpose and income and community.
I forget the name of the Chinese Taoist hundreds of years ago was confronted by the beurocrats on the banks of a stream and asked he he would take a position in governing the people. His reply was " I would rather sit here squeezing mud between my toes."
“These [sic] is a waste of human labor. Labor that could be put to better and more productive uses”.
I had concerns about this statement in Robert Malone's piece. The whole piece seemed to me to be written by someone who didn't really know the issues but wanted to be in on the conversation. Maybe I was being naive, but it seemed the he was ill-informed rather than intentional in his stance. Regardless, it is harmful to support a position that you don't have full knowledge on.
I am writing a piece on motherhood...thinking of calling it "Keeping the Home Fires Burning". My main point will be the undervaluing of the role of the stay-at-home mother (or parent of any kind). These women and girls are labouring for their families...what greater productivity is there??!!
I don't know too much about Malone except what he has said about himself when describing his background. According to him his father and his wife's father held significant positions within DARPA or the Pentagon.
At one point Malone had mentioned developing a different type of vaxx for COVID which would've been ludicrous since why would you need a vaxx for a scamdemic.
That being said, it's difficult to tell where anyone is really coming from as everyone is being attacked and propagandized from a "different angle," but amazingly populations who believe their ideologies are opposing are in reality being herded into the same One World Governance.
You've referenced many of the same materials I've read. I also read George Webb's Substack filled with information he and his team have dug-up about Malone and which they continue to append. Webb is compelled to continue to needle Malone who has legal law suits against Dr. Jane Ruby and Dr. Peter Breggins with his wife, Ginger for $25,000,000.00 apiece and made claims proven untrue by both in their Broadcasts. Of course, it's all a threat and his goal is to SHUT THEM BOTH DOWN...
MALONE'S ARE HIDING SOMETHING HUGE ABOUT THEMSELVES AS SO MANY AMONG THE ESTABLISHMENT RULING SCIENCE GURU'S NOW DO.
Some people talk about other people and some people talk about ideas.
Some of us think about ideas we like from another person. We take them on board, work with them, we integrate them, change them, evolve them into our world view, and move on one bit more educated than we were before. Once we have done our work on their ideas, the person who initially expressed them becomes irrelevant. They are now our ideas, thankyou.
Some of us reject some ideas from another person that we do not resonate with. We do not take them on board. We feel qualified to make that decision - the decision about how much of another person's ideas we should take on board and how much we should reject. We can actually do that; accept some ideas from a person and reject others. We do not have to agree 100% with everything they say to be able to extract what resonates and reject what does not from any single person.
It seems to me that this article is like so many - testosterone fuelled. This man is not saying exactly what I want him to say so I will kill him. And it is telling the rest of us not to trust this man and take ANYTHING he says on board. Whoopie, are we not capable ourselves of working out what does or does not resonate? Are we so irresponsible that we need one man to tell us not to trust another man, at all, to any degree? Why would we believe either, in that case?
So I ask myself, without re-reading the article, what is my "take-away" from spending my time reading this article for the first time. In what way did Paul Cudenac add value to my understanding of life. Well actually, the only thing I remember from the article is the fact of his assault on Malone. That was my only takeaway. So then I went back and re-read the article to see if I could find any ideas that add to my understanding of life. Well, yes, once I filter out the rubbish about Malone, there is a discussion hidden under there that we really DO need to have. We need to be talking about what kind of social/political/economic organisation can bring about the most desirable living conditions for the greatest number of people. Do we want more industrialization, ARE we better of with or without washing machines?
But that was lost on me. The only thing I recalled from the article is the continuation of the sport of Malone bashing. And that is all everyone else heard as well, if the comments here are anything to go by - almost all Malone bashing and none about what level of industrialization we really want. Do we want a world in which women "are put to use"? Do we really care about what Malone thinks? What do WE think? And once we know, how are we going to go about creating the system we want?
I was shocked by Malone's article and I think it is important to call out those, on the "left" or the "right", who pose as rebels while fundamentally supporting the system. If you are interested in the core organic radical philosophy behind the ephemeral critique, try The Withway - https://winteroakpress.files.wordpress.com/2023/06/the-withway-paul-cudenec.pdf
There are degrees of "supporting the system". ALL the doctors on Substack, with the possible exception of a mere two of them that I am aware of, are still "supporting the system", Malone included. Of course they are. They have to. The very fact that they ever supported allopathic medicine shows some kind of weird mental warp. How could anyone have supported a system that is so contrary to nature and common sense? But they did. So when they lose confidence in some part of that system, it is reasonable for them to devise a kind of logically consistent cosmology whereby they can hold on to the rest of the system, for fear of invalidating their entire lives. Their duplicity is pretty much inevitable. It may be deliberate but is far more likely to be part of their survival mechanism. I still claim that the FLCCC type doctors are doing FAR more harm than good, despite their best intentions. After all, they still believe in drugs and they still have no idea whatsoever, despite the good science available, as the true causes of covid and long covid, and thus viable treatments. They are blind to truth and and will stay that way. To err is human after all.
I have, myself, in Anno Domini 2021, washed my clothes by hand in a clear mountain stream. For several months, that was what I had available. It is not pleasant nor is it fun. If you have never had to do so, you are very blessed.
Shakers in Ohio and elsewhere invented many gadgets and tools and machines for doing work faster so they could spend more time in prayer. People have invented many things to make life easier. Otherwise they would rarely have time to read what you write.
I don't care much for Malone's way of talking about putting labour to better use. But putting it to less arduous work and having a few nice things is good. I despise the way the useless leaders want to consume the labour of others.
But I suspect that you don't want 5 billion more readers, do you? Because they would need computers to see your words. And power to run those devices.
No, I don't want billions of followers on here. I just want the industrialist destruction of our world, for the sake of profits for the greedy few, to stop.
This is still up. https://budbromley.blog/2022/02/17/dr-robert-malone-in-hawaii-in-talk-story-with-children/ See what it tells you about Dr. Malone and his Dr. wife. In the end he is still promoting vaxxes. I believe the only thing to say to kids asking about vaxxination is to run as fast as possible in the opposite direction to anyone promoting the killer jabs. Out of respect they call him Uncle, turns my stomach to hear that.
Thanks for posting that. Yeah, it's really gross watching the kids place their trust in him as a "caring adult figure". And isn't it weird how his wife acts throughout? It's almost like she is helping to "handle" him in the situation. "Let me ask you a question, do you want the vaccine?" That's not appropriate. What a jerk.
Too bad he didn't promote science and the arts of farming like he claims too.
I think vaxxxinations ought to be illegal, at this point. Like murder still is? Unless your name is Malone, gates, or Biden, Nuland, Sullivan, Blinken, Fauci.
Then you got free reign to kill as many as you can...
I just watched the video...I really don't hear them supporting the injections. They actually directly said to that boy who asked whether he should have it, that they didn't think he should. They were also actively encouraging the children to trust their own natural immunity. Is there something I am missing?
Given that these jabs are the deadliest genocide in human history, and given that Dr. Malone knows that all too well, as he claims to have invented the technology, I find the uplifting and comforting tone of the conversation to be more than simply disengenious and patronizing. If he had said, avoid this jab at all costs, no matter what, no human needs them whatsoever, they may kill you or maim you, I would cut him some slack. Mayble Malone is ok with genocide, or feels its needed? If he was as injured as he claims to be from his own alleged jabs, he would be speaking much more clearly about the whole matter. He is insideous, this is clear to me. Most kids who got a real jab will be sterile if they live long enough to find out.
I get it. I just think the way he (they both) spoke was completely appropriate considering their immediate audience. Do you really think there is any value is scaring the life out of these kids? It is a lot for even a grown, mature adult to handle...existentially speaking. A calm approach is also much more easily digested by people, especially a varied audience watching it more broadly across the Internet. I actually think it is a great video that could be shared for other kids to watch because it is so calm.
I am disappointed the events of the last few years haven't opened people's eyes to the harm done to children from vaccines for decades. People don't seem to make the connection. Even people who see the greed of Big Pharma in this, seem to think it is a new thing, and don't realise that the damage and lies have been happening since the introduction of vaccines. So I absolutely understand the frustration and wanting people to get angry and more definitive. I just don't think that is the way to get people to listen, especially kids.
I wonder what the kids who have been killed or maimed would think of the video?....I have a feeling they would find it as disturbing as I do. Talking calmly about genocide....being reasonable about murder. Malone knows full well what the jabs do, through his research and his own experience.
I believe we want the same thing. There is so much pain and harm. We need change.
Does Malone represent a "Plan B" for global capitalism? That is, if the Liberal version fails, the Conservative version kicks in? That way they keep the pendulum of the Left/Right theater going?
They are "good" Globalists.
I stopped reading Malone after about the fifth post he wrote about his wife and his farm and his travels, in which process of reading I felt like a total loser, like I am unworthy of reading such fabulous wisdom from such an accomplished man, who actually created RNA and DNA, not the great spirit God....
I have found him "sketchy as all get out" since finding him online back in 2020. He is everywhere and he has his hands in everything. I have watched him talk about "A" as though he were in favor of it when in fact he is actually representing "B" by using careful language and by positioning himself carefully. If you listen to him talk to the children in a video made in Hawaii in 2020, about the "vaccine" verses the "virus", it is very clear what is going on there. The man is not here to help. That's my personal opinion. I don't trust him as far as I could throw him AND his grandma. (sorry grandma, you are probably cool, it's not your fault).
Gandhi encouraged the Indian population to boycott imported clothing because he saw that millions of people would lose purpose and income and community.
I forget the name of the Chinese Taoist hundreds of years ago was confronted by the beurocrats on the banks of a stream and asked he he would take a position in governing the people. His reply was " I would rather sit here squeezing mud between my toes."
We need involuntary leaders!!!!.
I only see this now.
you might want to read this
https://kathyclarke.substack.com/p/is-graphene-oxide-causing-cancer
Thanks. Interesting.
Some of the things he says sound eerily like they could have come from Bill Gates. Not a good look...
“These [sic] is a waste of human labor. Labor that could be put to better and more productive uses”.
I had concerns about this statement in Robert Malone's piece. The whole piece seemed to me to be written by someone who didn't really know the issues but wanted to be in on the conversation. Maybe I was being naive, but it seemed the he was ill-informed rather than intentional in his stance. Regardless, it is harmful to support a position that you don't have full knowledge on.
I am writing a piece on motherhood...thinking of calling it "Keeping the Home Fires Burning". My main point will be the undervaluing of the role of the stay-at-home mother (or parent of any kind). These women and girls are labouring for their families...what greater productivity is there??!!
I don't know too much about Malone except what he has said about himself when describing his background. According to him his father and his wife's father held significant positions within DARPA or the Pentagon.
At one point Malone had mentioned developing a different type of vaxx for COVID which would've been ludicrous since why would you need a vaxx for a scamdemic.
That being said, it's difficult to tell where anyone is really coming from as everyone is being attacked and propagandized from a "different angle," but amazingly populations who believe their ideologies are opposing are in reality being herded into the same One World Governance.
You've referenced many of the same materials I've read. I also read George Webb's Substack filled with information he and his team have dug-up about Malone and which they continue to append. Webb is compelled to continue to needle Malone who has legal law suits against Dr. Jane Ruby and Dr. Peter Breggins with his wife, Ginger for $25,000,000.00 apiece and made claims proven untrue by both in their Broadcasts. Of course, it's all a threat and his goal is to SHUT THEM BOTH DOWN...
MALONE'S ARE HIDING SOMETHING HUGE ABOUT THEMSELVES AS SO MANY AMONG THE ESTABLISHMENT RULING SCIENCE GURU'S NOW DO.
Some people talk about other people and some people talk about ideas.
Some of us think about ideas we like from another person. We take them on board, work with them, we integrate them, change them, evolve them into our world view, and move on one bit more educated than we were before. Once we have done our work on their ideas, the person who initially expressed them becomes irrelevant. They are now our ideas, thankyou.
Some of us reject some ideas from another person that we do not resonate with. We do not take them on board. We feel qualified to make that decision - the decision about how much of another person's ideas we should take on board and how much we should reject. We can actually do that; accept some ideas from a person and reject others. We do not have to agree 100% with everything they say to be able to extract what resonates and reject what does not from any single person.
It seems to me that this article is like so many - testosterone fuelled. This man is not saying exactly what I want him to say so I will kill him. And it is telling the rest of us not to trust this man and take ANYTHING he says on board. Whoopie, are we not capable ourselves of working out what does or does not resonate? Are we so irresponsible that we need one man to tell us not to trust another man, at all, to any degree? Why would we believe either, in that case?
So I ask myself, without re-reading the article, what is my "take-away" from spending my time reading this article for the first time. In what way did Paul Cudenac add value to my understanding of life. Well actually, the only thing I remember from the article is the fact of his assault on Malone. That was my only takeaway. So then I went back and re-read the article to see if I could find any ideas that add to my understanding of life. Well, yes, once I filter out the rubbish about Malone, there is a discussion hidden under there that we really DO need to have. We need to be talking about what kind of social/political/economic organisation can bring about the most desirable living conditions for the greatest number of people. Do we want more industrialization, ARE we better of with or without washing machines?
But that was lost on me. The only thing I recalled from the article is the continuation of the sport of Malone bashing. And that is all everyone else heard as well, if the comments here are anything to go by - almost all Malone bashing and none about what level of industrialization we really want. Do we want a world in which women "are put to use"? Do we really care about what Malone thinks? What do WE think? And once we know, how are we going to go about creating the system we want?
Let's leave Malone with his horses, and move on!
I was shocked by Malone's article and I think it is important to call out those, on the "left" or the "right", who pose as rebels while fundamentally supporting the system. If you are interested in the core organic radical philosophy behind the ephemeral critique, try The Withway - https://winteroakpress.files.wordpress.com/2023/06/the-withway-paul-cudenec.pdf
There are degrees of "supporting the system". ALL the doctors on Substack, with the possible exception of a mere two of them that I am aware of, are still "supporting the system", Malone included. Of course they are. They have to. The very fact that they ever supported allopathic medicine shows some kind of weird mental warp. How could anyone have supported a system that is so contrary to nature and common sense? But they did. So when they lose confidence in some part of that system, it is reasonable for them to devise a kind of logically consistent cosmology whereby they can hold on to the rest of the system, for fear of invalidating their entire lives. Their duplicity is pretty much inevitable. It may be deliberate but is far more likely to be part of their survival mechanism. I still claim that the FLCCC type doctors are doing FAR more harm than good, despite their best intentions. After all, they still believe in drugs and they still have no idea whatsoever, despite the good science available, as the true causes of covid and long covid, and thus viable treatments. They are blind to truth and and will stay that way. To err is human after all.
I have, myself, in Anno Domini 2021, washed my clothes by hand in a clear mountain stream. For several months, that was what I had available. It is not pleasant nor is it fun. If you have never had to do so, you are very blessed.
Shakers in Ohio and elsewhere invented many gadgets and tools and machines for doing work faster so they could spend more time in prayer. People have invented many things to make life easier. Otherwise they would rarely have time to read what you write.
I don't care much for Malone's way of talking about putting labour to better use. But putting it to less arduous work and having a few nice things is good. I despise the way the useless leaders want to consume the labour of others.
But I suspect that you don't want 5 billion more readers, do you? Because they would need computers to see your words. And power to run those devices.
No, I don't want billions of followers on here. I just want the industrialist destruction of our world, for the sake of profits for the greedy few, to stop.
Ah. Well I guess I should throw away the phone that I read your posts on and never buy another. But then I would miss your new posts.