The debate you're referring to might be very similar to the one held when the noncompliant "rejected" the jab. However, when the "final" debate is held the technocratic biosecurity surveillance state will be much more refined and quite diabolical.
If you haven't noticed the biosecurity surveillance state is continually being heightened. It'll continue to intensify until the entire planet is living under a totalitarian Global Governance shithole . As that happens there will be a series of debates where hundreds of millions are
I had noticed that, yes. I've also noticed I'm not the only one noticing it and that a lot of people are getting seriously pissed off by it. I'm leaving the option open that the predictive programming won't work. And my original point was perhaps not clear: becoming transhuman is for some more of a death than the end of the physical body. That's the debate I was referring to.
I noticed that, too. But the real question remains. How can we object to the downfall of our human sovereignty? I can't imagine that almost eight bn people can't stand up to a mere 8,000 malignant narcissistic globalists about instilling total bodily digital surveillance 24/7 of our every move.
it is upon us to decide if we go along or not. if you chose your way there will be doors opening. thats what i experience. anyway this seems good to know now: https://davidnixon.substack.com/
detox for the mind and the body seems to be needed
"...cages that they can’t call camps, for fear of equivalence exposed..." — nailed it!
"Each stage in their “progress” has hauled us a step further away from our natural freedom and a step closer to their final solutions."
The final solution will be death for those who reject transhumanism.
Who will actually experience "death" in this scenario is up for debate, I think!
The debate you're referring to might be very similar to the one held when the noncompliant "rejected" the jab. However, when the "final" debate is held the technocratic biosecurity surveillance state will be much more refined and quite diabolical.
Can you elucidate a bit more what the premises are of the kind of debate you think I'm "referring", so I have more clarity on how to respond? Thanks!
If you haven't noticed the biosecurity surveillance state is continually being heightened. It'll continue to intensify until the entire planet is living under a totalitarian Global Governance shithole . As that happens there will be a series of debates where hundreds of millions are
periodically purged.
I had noticed that, yes. I've also noticed I'm not the only one noticing it and that a lot of people are getting seriously pissed off by it. I'm leaving the option open that the predictive programming won't work. And my original point was perhaps not clear: becoming transhuman is for some more of a death than the end of the physical body. That's the debate I was referring to.
I wouldn't know about all that, as I'm an agnostic.
I noticed that, too. But the real question remains. How can we object to the downfall of our human sovereignty? I can't imagine that almost eight bn people can't stand up to a mere 8,000 malignant narcissistic globalists about instilling total bodily digital surveillance 24/7 of our every move.
Encl.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fsSJBS-uk8
it is upon us to decide if we go along or not. if you chose your way there will be doors opening. thats what i experience. anyway this seems good to know now: https://davidnixon.substack.com/
detox for the mind and the body seems to be needed
'We were not expecting this world. We were not made for this world.'
I wholeheartedly disagree. I am curious, what, then were, (are), we made for?