This is a great formulation, that is, the "uncorrupted" vs the corrupted. It is very useful. It's so simple I wonder why I have not seen something similar before. Before I got to the end I kept thinking Oliver Anthony is the uncorrupted! Right, if people can unite around being uncorrupted, then left/right, religious/non religious, conservative/liberal, etc. cease to be forces for division.
This is a great formulation, that is, the "uncorrupted" vs the corrupted. It is very useful. It's so simple I wonder why I have not seen something similar before. Before I got to the end I kept thinking Oliver Anthony is the uncorrupted! Right, if people can unite around being uncorrupted, then left/right, religious/non religious, conservative/liberal, etc. cease to be forces for division.
Unfortunately, for now anyway, the divisions are butting up against each other more than ever whilst the rest of us look on and shake our heads. I'm not sure any of these factions wish to contemplate the middle path, coming together around common goals etc. They are hellbent on destroying the other. It's their way or the highway.
Those divisions are promoted, exacerbated and sometimes manufactured out of whole cloth by the ruling class. Oliver Anthony's meteoric rise to national prominence (at least musically) is evidence that many many people are tired of that. As the goal of the Liberal establishment is to sow division, he is a threat to them. (Corrupted) Conservatives are trying to claim him as there own. But Anthony has pointed out that the Rich Men North of Richmond are not just Democrats, he is criticizing the GOP too. They have now started to disown him (via people like Stew Peters) by calling Anthony a CIA plant. In my view Peters is the CIA media plant ( I have thought so long before Oliver Anthony). Anthony's message threatens both wings of the duopoly. His songs and their popularity demonstrate that there is a great hunger among people for uncorrupted values and human solidarity.
I agree that we are being influenced by internet personalities and that the divisions are deliberately exacerbated to keep us distracted and fighting each other instead of working towards common goals.
I think the answer is to maintain central admin for infrastructure, defense and so on but everything else including healthcare and education should be decentralized as much as possible each according to their own values. Central dominance on these matters has to end. It's already gone too far.
The Oliver Anthony thing? I've heard people say that he lives on 90 acres of land and that he's an alcoholic depressive. He turned down big money offers (and control) but is doing better than most with his tour.
The fact that his song gets as big as it has on social media probably means that it was allowed to do so... for a reason.
Doesn't this remind anyone of Marxist and Bolshevik strategies that get the working class underdogs to reach for their pitchforks again?
I mean... we've already seen messy versions of that over the last three years (Antifa/BLM) but a more structured worker's revolt in America? Maybe the controllers are trying to spread a little bit of that revolutionary spirit from France that we've been seeing there.
If you get my drift, it's all about creating victim consciousness. It honestly doesn't make much difference which side you're on. All that matters is that some people somewhere are disgruntled and that you as a master manipulator can pull on those threads and get the 10% or 20% to carry out your coup.
Once you've overturned the current regime, you reward and punish everyone involved and get back to business as usual. Those at the top of the heap, the ones pulling the strings, the man behind the curtain, didn't have to change a damned thing about their lives. They figured out how to play this game a long long time ago.
OA has been very upfront with where he stands. If you desire to understand him, listen to his own words - both lyrically and his public statements. Both "sides" are trying to control what he is saying for their own ends.
It has been discussed for over ten years that the anonymous structure of Antifa was ripe for infiltration by state actors. BLM is funded by the Ford Foundation ALONE to over $100 million bucks, and they are funded by other oligarch and Big Business interests. These along with the billionaire-funded "trans movement" are what is known as "Commodified Rebellions", they are pseudo rebellions meant to dissipate and/or distract or divert rebellious energy to various kinds of political dead ends. They have nothing to do with a "workers revolt." In fact the vast majority of people who participate in these astro-turf movements are middle class white people who are straight.
Yes I agree that those movements have nothing to do with an authentic "workers revolt" but neither did the original ones. They just employ a latent energy that is always there to tap into and feed off of it.
We're dealing with an institutionalized parasitic class that understands the resource equation better than the hoi poloi. All farmers have to cull the herd at some point, but these pesky humans can't seem to get the message. ;)
Still don't understand why the guy didn't just put the money down on a small house instead of buying 92 acres and living in a camper with a tarp. Unless, of course, he knows perfectly well that he's going to be building a nice big farm house on that land where he can rock on the porch singing the blues and sipping a fine whiskey. Not a bad life in the end.
There are many theories as to who the Elite Master Farmers of this world are and if you point the finger at one group or another you will be harassed by members of that group or their loyal defenders so without getting too specific generational wealth accumulated in the hands of dynastic families and their banking institutions based in Switzerland to the point where they were pulling the strings of most if not all governments and even the Roman Catholic Church. Other groups are used as willing patsies, bag holders, and scapegoats because it takes heat off the core families. Other than that, they control the few conglomerates that in turn control all corporations on the planet and the core populations are controlled under a militarized understanding of group and individual psychology to the point where individuals and the groups they belong to are not responsible for their own decisions and actions.
On a deeper level, the human species now functions much like an ant colony with a similar structure and "class system." Without this top down structure and the control mechanisms it creates, industrial civilization would fall apart and we'd be back to scraping about in the dirt.
So while the Elite Master Farmers (from their own perspective) see us as animals to be exploited, most people on the planet would not be alive or enjoy the standard of living they have if it were not for this "system."
I'm sure that was pretty much the argument used by the original slave-masters. "We feed them, give them shelter and work... What sort of standard of living would they enjoy without us?" For me, the starting point for any "standard of living" worth having is freedom!
Sometimes I would like to live in log cabin in the wilderness and be done with "the rest of it." But it's what we would have to give up now that keeps most people in the loop. We simply can't feed everyone that's alive that way now. But I guess we can try to push back somewhat so that the system isn't as corrupt as it is now.
This is a great formulation, that is, the "uncorrupted" vs the corrupted. It is very useful. It's so simple I wonder why I have not seen something similar before. Before I got to the end I kept thinking Oliver Anthony is the uncorrupted! Right, if people can unite around being uncorrupted, then left/right, religious/non religious, conservative/liberal, etc. cease to be forces for division.
Unfortunately, for now anyway, the divisions are butting up against each other more than ever whilst the rest of us look on and shake our heads. I'm not sure any of these factions wish to contemplate the middle path, coming together around common goals etc. They are hellbent on destroying the other. It's their way or the highway.
Those divisions are promoted, exacerbated and sometimes manufactured out of whole cloth by the ruling class. Oliver Anthony's meteoric rise to national prominence (at least musically) is evidence that many many people are tired of that. As the goal of the Liberal establishment is to sow division, he is a threat to them. (Corrupted) Conservatives are trying to claim him as there own. But Anthony has pointed out that the Rich Men North of Richmond are not just Democrats, he is criticizing the GOP too. They have now started to disown him (via people like Stew Peters) by calling Anthony a CIA plant. In my view Peters is the CIA media plant ( I have thought so long before Oliver Anthony). Anthony's message threatens both wings of the duopoly. His songs and their popularity demonstrate that there is a great hunger among people for uncorrupted values and human solidarity.
I agree that we are being influenced by internet personalities and that the divisions are deliberately exacerbated to keep us distracted and fighting each other instead of working towards common goals.
I think the answer is to maintain central admin for infrastructure, defense and so on but everything else including healthcare and education should be decentralized as much as possible each according to their own values. Central dominance on these matters has to end. It's already gone too far.
The Oliver Anthony thing? I've heard people say that he lives on 90 acres of land and that he's an alcoholic depressive. He turned down big money offers (and control) but is doing better than most with his tour.
The fact that his song gets as big as it has on social media probably means that it was allowed to do so... for a reason.
Doesn't this remind anyone of Marxist and Bolshevik strategies that get the working class underdogs to reach for their pitchforks again?
I mean... we've already seen messy versions of that over the last three years (Antifa/BLM) but a more structured worker's revolt in America? Maybe the controllers are trying to spread a little bit of that revolutionary spirit from France that we've been seeing there.
If you get my drift, it's all about creating victim consciousness. It honestly doesn't make much difference which side you're on. All that matters is that some people somewhere are disgruntled and that you as a master manipulator can pull on those threads and get the 10% or 20% to carry out your coup.
Once you've overturned the current regime, you reward and punish everyone involved and get back to business as usual. Those at the top of the heap, the ones pulling the strings, the man behind the curtain, didn't have to change a damned thing about their lives. They figured out how to play this game a long long time ago.
Just saying.
OA has been very upfront with where he stands. If you desire to understand him, listen to his own words - both lyrically and his public statements. Both "sides" are trying to control what he is saying for their own ends.
It has been discussed for over ten years that the anonymous structure of Antifa was ripe for infiltration by state actors. BLM is funded by the Ford Foundation ALONE to over $100 million bucks, and they are funded by other oligarch and Big Business interests. These along with the billionaire-funded "trans movement" are what is known as "Commodified Rebellions", they are pseudo rebellions meant to dissipate and/or distract or divert rebellious energy to various kinds of political dead ends. They have nothing to do with a "workers revolt." In fact the vast majority of people who participate in these astro-turf movements are middle class white people who are straight.
Yes I agree that those movements have nothing to do with an authentic "workers revolt" but neither did the original ones. They just employ a latent energy that is always there to tap into and feed off of it.
We're dealing with an institutionalized parasitic class that understands the resource equation better than the hoi poloi. All farmers have to cull the herd at some point, but these pesky humans can't seem to get the message. ;)
Had fun reading the comments here...
https://www.savingcountrymusic.com/separating-truth-from-fiction-in-oliver-anthonys-ascent/
Still don't understand why the guy didn't just put the money down on a small house instead of buying 92 acres and living in a camper with a tarp. Unless, of course, he knows perfectly well that he's going to be building a nice big farm house on that land where he can rock on the porch singing the blues and sipping a fine whiskey. Not a bad life in the end.
Who's the "farmer"?
There are many theories as to who the Elite Master Farmers of this world are and if you point the finger at one group or another you will be harassed by members of that group or their loyal defenders so without getting too specific generational wealth accumulated in the hands of dynastic families and their banking institutions based in Switzerland to the point where they were pulling the strings of most if not all governments and even the Roman Catholic Church. Other groups are used as willing patsies, bag holders, and scapegoats because it takes heat off the core families. Other than that, they control the few conglomerates that in turn control all corporations on the planet and the core populations are controlled under a militarized understanding of group and individual psychology to the point where individuals and the groups they belong to are not responsible for their own decisions and actions.
On a deeper level, the human species now functions much like an ant colony with a similar structure and "class system." Without this top down structure and the control mechanisms it creates, industrial civilization would fall apart and we'd be back to scraping about in the dirt.
So while the Elite Master Farmers (from their own perspective) see us as animals to be exploited, most people on the planet would not be alive or enjoy the standard of living they have if it were not for this "system."
I'm sure that was pretty much the argument used by the original slave-masters. "We feed them, give them shelter and work... What sort of standard of living would they enjoy without us?" For me, the starting point for any "standard of living" worth having is freedom!
Sometimes I would like to live in log cabin in the wilderness and be done with "the rest of it." But it's what we would have to give up now that keeps most people in the loop. We simply can't feed everyone that's alive that way now. But I guess we can try to push back somewhat so that the system isn't as corrupt as it is now.
Exactly!