The criminocracy is in danger of losing its carefully-constructed shield of invisibility as it accelerates its deranged bid for total and permanent global control.
Iain wrote "The High Court of Justice has denied Hall the opportunity..." — I keep thinking there's a typo there. At what point will we be able to dispense with the pretense and call spades spades; in this case "The High Court of Injustice"?
Similarly, your Jerusalem Summit quote "“the dissolution of UNRWA is an essential prerequisite for any comprehensive, durable solution of the Palestinian issue” looks to have been playing it safe, using the word "durable", when "final" would have been more honest.
"Why would the system feel the burning need, one might ask, to create fake or false-flag events to discredit Islamist groups ......... The answer, I suspect, lies in the way in which our political institutions have been systematically captured by elements favourable to, and often funded by, Israel..." — it's important to remember that Israeli power, along with the entire banking system (certainly in the West), is inextricably entwined with usury. In contrast, Islam rejects usury. That alone is reason enough for the criminocracy to "discredit Islamist groups".
You end this post with three excellent questions. My reply to all three is the same: I wouldn't doubt it!
RE: "...the Political paradigm must be replaced by a Humanitarian paradigm"
One of lesser known but very important aspects of totalitarianism is the erasure of politics. The Ancient Greeks thought of politics in a broad way: even two people discussing the issues of society would be considered politics. More contemporaneously, politics would include political debate, of the presentation of facts of the matter, a consideration of the issues from various points of view. Since the advent of Trump Derangement Syndrome, (and most visible with the critics of Covid policies) that has all been erased (even in the limited form we had), replaced by moral posturing, demonization of the political opponent, suppression of free speech and censorship.
Iain wrote "The High Court of Justice has denied Hall the opportunity..." — I keep thinking there's a typo there. At what point will we be able to dispense with the pretense and call spades spades; in this case "The High Court of Injustice"?
Similarly, your Jerusalem Summit quote "“the dissolution of UNRWA is an essential prerequisite for any comprehensive, durable solution of the Palestinian issue” looks to have been playing it safe, using the word "durable", when "final" would have been more honest.
"Why would the system feel the burning need, one might ask, to create fake or false-flag events to discredit Islamist groups ......... The answer, I suspect, lies in the way in which our political institutions have been systematically captured by elements favourable to, and often funded by, Israel..." — it's important to remember that Israeli power, along with the entire banking system (certainly in the West), is inextricably entwined with usury. In contrast, Islam rejects usury. That alone is reason enough for the criminocracy to "discredit Islamist groups".
You end this post with three excellent questions. My reply to all three is the same: I wouldn't doubt it!
RE: "...the Political paradigm must be replaced by a Humanitarian paradigm"
One of lesser known but very important aspects of totalitarianism is the erasure of politics. The Ancient Greeks thought of politics in a broad way: even two people discussing the issues of society would be considered politics. More contemporaneously, politics would include political debate, of the presentation of facts of the matter, a consideration of the issues from various points of view. Since the advent of Trump Derangement Syndrome, (and most visible with the critics of Covid policies) that has all been erased (even in the limited form we had), replaced by moral posturing, demonization of the political opponent, suppression of free speech and censorship.