The criminocracy is in danger of losing its carefully-constructed shield of invisibilty as it accelerates its deranged bid for total and permanent global control. It is therefore obliged to ramp up its attacks on those who dare expose its existence, its crimes and its lies.
Iain wrote "The High Court of Justice has denied Hall the opportunity..." — I keep thinking there's a typo there. At what point will we be able to dispense with the pretense and call spades spades; in this case "The High Court of Injustice"?
Similarly, your Jerusalem Summit quote "“the dissolution of UNRWA is an essential prerequisite for any comprehensive, durable solution of the Palestinian issue” looks to have been playing it safe, using the word "durable", when "final" would have been more honest.
"Why would the system feel the burning need, one might ask, to create fake or false-flag events to discredit Islamist groups ......... The answer, I suspect, lies in the way in which our political institutions have been systematically captured by elements favourable to, and often funded by, Israel..." — it's important to remember that Israeli power, along with the entire banking system (certainly in the West), is inextricably entwined with usury. In contrast, Islam rejects usury. That alone is reason enough for the criminocracy to "discredit Islamist groups".
You end this post with three excellent questions. My reply to all three is the same: I wouldn't doubt it!
RE: "...the Political paradigm must be replaced by a Humanitarian paradigm"
One of lesser known but very important aspects of totalitarianism is the erasure of politics. The Ancient Greeks thought of politics in a broad way: even two people discussing the issues of society would be considered politics. More contemporaneously, politics would include political debate, of the presentation of facts of the matter, a consideration of the issues from various points of view. Since the advent of Trump Derangement Syndrome, (and most visible with the critics of Covid policies) that has all been erased (even in the limited form we had), replaced by moral posturing, demonization of the political opponent, suppression of free speech and censorship.
It has been exposed that UNRWA has involved itself in providing cover for Hamas to operate from under their HQ? Or do you deny that Paul?
While Iain is astute but one thing is clear Jihad is real, and Hamas are not what they claim to be.
Israel disengaged from Gaza in 2005, evicting over 9,000 Israeli citizens living in 25 settlements. In June 2007, Hamas took over the Gaza Strip from the Palestinian Authority, never again to have an election for its citizens, and in return for this disengagement and began firing thousands of rockets and mortar shells at southern Israeli towns and villages, terrorizing and destabilizing the lives of hundreds of thousands of Israelis. Now of course its all Israel's fault. So, I cannot agree with you or Iain.
Iain wrote "The High Court of Justice has denied Hall the opportunity..." — I keep thinking there's a typo there. At what point will we be able to dispense with the pretense and call spades spades; in this case "The High Court of Injustice"?
Similarly, your Jerusalem Summit quote "“the dissolution of UNRWA is an essential prerequisite for any comprehensive, durable solution of the Palestinian issue” looks to have been playing it safe, using the word "durable", when "final" would have been more honest.
"Why would the system feel the burning need, one might ask, to create fake or false-flag events to discredit Islamist groups ......... The answer, I suspect, lies in the way in which our political institutions have been systematically captured by elements favourable to, and often funded by, Israel..." — it's important to remember that Israeli power, along with the entire banking system (certainly in the West), is inextricably entwined with usury. In contrast, Islam rejects usury. That alone is reason enough for the criminocracy to "discredit Islamist groups".
You end this post with three excellent questions. My reply to all three is the same: I wouldn't doubt it!
RE: "...the Political paradigm must be replaced by a Humanitarian paradigm"
One of lesser known but very important aspects of totalitarianism is the erasure of politics. The Ancient Greeks thought of politics in a broad way: even two people discussing the issues of society would be considered politics. More contemporaneously, politics would include political debate, of the presentation of facts of the matter, a consideration of the issues from various points of view. Since the advent of Trump Derangement Syndrome, (and most visible with the critics of Covid policies) that has all been erased (even in the limited form we had), replaced by moral posturing, demonization of the political opponent, suppression of free speech and censorship.
It has been exposed that UNRWA has involved itself in providing cover for Hamas to operate from under their HQ? Or do you deny that Paul?
While Iain is astute but one thing is clear Jihad is real, and Hamas are not what they claim to be.
Israel disengaged from Gaza in 2005, evicting over 9,000 Israeli citizens living in 25 settlements. In June 2007, Hamas took over the Gaza Strip from the Palestinian Authority, never again to have an election for its citizens, and in return for this disengagement and began firing thousands of rockets and mortar shells at southern Israeli towns and villages, terrorizing and destabilizing the lives of hundreds of thousands of Israelis. Now of course its all Israel's fault. So, I cannot agree with you or Iain.