I have written before about how the “communist” revolution in the USSR was a scheme cooked up by the global criminocrats to impose on the Russian people their long-term authoritarian-industrial agenda of dispossession and enslavement.
From our positions of privilege and material ease, it's almost impossible to appreciate the privation and hardships the dispossessed (small) farmers must have suffered.
“And there is a particular resonance with the 2020s in the regime’s mission to wipe out small farmers in the name of “progress”.” — The parallels are as conspicuous as they are sickening.
Worth repeating: “His book serves as a useful reminder that British imperialism, US imperialism, Soviet communism, globalisation and the proposed “multi-polar” new world order are all aspects of one single ongoing crime against humanity.”
Excellent article and an eye opening selection of examples and figures - paints a stark picture.
Revolutions seem to almost consistently bring about more oppression than whatever they just overthrew. The American revolution was followed by crushingly high taxes worse than under England, and bad enough to lead to multiple farmer’s rebellions, the French Revolution had its Terror, the Soviets a much longer terror and slave labor as you show here.
It’s like these are “Great Resets” and in a way that’s what revolution means - to revolve; go round in a circle, go back to were you just left. In each case the people were going in the right direction before the revolution - the Americans were fiercely independent, had low taxes, and forced England to back off of several new taxes using boycotts – they (the Americans) didn’t need to escalate it into a war - but they did. The French sound like they were steadily throwing off the feudal chains while still under Louis the XVI. The Russians from what I understand were rolling back feudalism even while still under the Tzars.
It’s like the revolutions are derailments throwing people off tracks that were heading in a reasonably good direction.
Not sure that my speculation is of much value in the modern context since we don’t seem to be going in the right direction to begin with so maybe getting thrown off track in the modern context would be a good thing.
So it seems that the powers that be could sense a shift on the winds, and curated the resistance into a creature of its own design, to control corral & mitigate the threat. For example, recently read that the “aristocracy” of France were funding the revolution sensing the collapse of the Royal house was imminent.
The "powers-that-be", certainly, but not necessarily the traditional aristocrats. In England, for example, Oliver Cromwell's "revolution" served to remove the Stuart monarchy and its conservatism, thus paving the way for the industrial exploitation of the population and its land - and turning the country into a base for the commercial imperialism that became globalisation. The genuine radicals in the struggle were used as pawns in a bigger game and then crushed - this is why the financiers of the City of London staged a celebratory banquet for Cromwell after he put down the rank-and-file mutiny in the New Model Army. Same pattern repeats over and over.
Great article. The more simply drawn parallels made between the ‘evils’ of the past and the evils of the present the better. As James Corbett is wont to remind us; the intent of the oligarchical parasites has been the same throughout all time. Absolute control by any means. Articles like yours help us to be able to think more clearly around these matters - and then, of course, to be able to feel and speak more clearly and incisively about them.
An interesting notion how the Bolsheviks who only remained in control for about five years unwittingly facilitated the Stalinist transformation of Czarist feudalism to state-owned industrial feudalism. Think about how much more stifling that "boot to the neck" would've been if Stalin could've deployed 21st Century surveillance technology.
The Rothschilds have their fingers in more pies than Jamie Oliver.
In the early 20th century the Russian oilfields at Baku were pumping more oil than the entire USA. The crude was shipped via a Rothschilds owned railroad over the mountains to a Rothschilds-run refinery at Batumi on the Black Sea to be processed and then exported by tanker. One of the Rothschilds employees at their refinery was a 23 yo Georgian. Supposedly a labor leader involved in organizing a strike for better wages - or was he really an undercover snitch less interested in worker solidarity than reporting news to his bosses the Rothschilds? The answer is hidden in the mists of time. This guy had the usual long unpronounceable Georgian name. But he would later simplify this and rise to greater prominence in the successor state to Russia, the USSR. In fact there would even be a city named after him. Just one of those coincidences, that Josef Stalin got his start as an employee of the richest family in Europe:).
Great article, thank you. Am expecting this region of small farmers in Portugal to be under attack somehow, sometime - but the rugged terrain is our advantage, unlike the flat-lands of the Alentejo.
Once again, instructive and thought-provoking. But the analogue with what is happening now is far from perfect.
First, the developed, already industrialised nations: the criminocrats are destroying key industries and putting many thousands out of work (thus effectively reducing industrial enslavement), whilst at the same time attacking small farmers and putting them out of work, in order to possess their land and either industrialise it with solar panels/batteries, or build houses on it, or 're-wild' it. None of these activities involve significant job (slave labour) creation. With the industrial sector also being decimated, dispossessed farmers also cannot find work in traditional industries either.
Second example, the Third World (Africa): globalists are actively preventing large scale industrialisation using fossil fuels as a cheap source of energy. So once again, the rural peasants who are being driven off their lands and into towns and cities will not be put to work in labour intensive industries, they will simply have no work (bar a few engaged in mining rare earth minerals for use in silly wind turbines and solar panels), and no real use that I can see, other than shipping them off to the First World to continue the process of displacement of native Europeans and Anglos in the former Colonies.
The primary purpose of today's criminocratic elite appears to be to enable massive transfer of wealth and land to the elite ruling classes, the impoverishment of the masses, not with the primary aim of enslaving them by forcing them into industrial labour, but simply by forcing them to be dependent upon a state which will withdraw support as it inevitably balloons uncontrollably, effectively meaning that the masses will starve/freeze to death/die from poverty-induced illnesses. The few left will be far more effectively and insidiously enslaved than any Russian peasant of the 1930s. They - and their children and their grandchildren - will never know anything different other than complete dependence upon the state in exchange for abject submission and the performance of minor tasks which machines cannot do. They will own nothing and be happy, confined to 15 minute cities, rarely, if ever, allowed into the rural areas reserved for the rich.
The era of mass industrial enslavement seems to be over. The elite are now in the process of harvesting the mass wealth generated from that era which was in operation over much of the 20th century. The now 'useless eaters' who formerly generated that wealth and who managed the land are now surplus to requirements and are due to be culled, once they have been dispossessed of their wealth and land.
I guess it depends upon your definition of 'industrialisation'. Schwab's retrogressive 'Fourth Industrial Revolution' is in fact a de-industrial revolution and the putting in place of a high tech digital maintenance and control system - which nevertheless requires an electrical infrastructure and communications network. The industrialisation which originally enslaved the masses ended up emancipating and enriching the masses, so it needed to be reversed - hence the 'Clean Energy' revolution.
Well, obviously there is no such thing as "clean energy" and the "clean" digital system depends on industrialism - extraction of minerals, manufacture, distribution, powering of the system and so on. It's not exactly the same form of industrialism as previously, any more than oil-powered industrialism was exactly the same as coal-powered industrialism, but it is the same beast. It is a means of converting organic matter (mineral, vegetal, animal, human) into a currency of power and control. Demonic.
The real useless eaters are the ones who fly jets and have multiple houses and servants.
They built the control grid that can easily be flipped on them. We are in a dystopia that can be a turn key utopia where mechanization can feed us all.
China sort of did that with their social credit system.
When an oligarch didn't play nice, they were denied access to flights and high speed trains and other luxuries. 😂
As for AI, they intended it to replace blue collar jobs but it's not really smart.
So actually, AI is better suited to replace politicians, corporate management, and finance than normal jobs that require dexterity and a brain.
AI cannot write or draw anything truly creative. It's derivative.
It cannot replace true creative works, just like a robot cannot replace troubleshooting in my field. Robots also cannot replace a truly skilled surgeon.
Ok the other hand, many writers and artists who just repeat bullshit are indeed bullshit jobs.
Same for parts changers in my field and pill pushers in the medical field.
Sadly though, AI is already replacing writers and artists. Many people who write fiction and paint or draw or otherwise create original art can't earn a living that way. They also need a day job in graphic design or commercial writing because creativity doesn't always pay the bills. So they may be "bullshit jobs" but they were potentially better than the bullshit job of working in a gas station or waiting tables which are the options once AI takes over the less creative side of writing and art.
Did you know that The Beatles worked with MK Ultra - the covert CIA operation researching and later conducting mind control? That particular song is said to be predictive programming for one-world government.
Art used for mind control purposes: literally a bullshit job!
From our positions of privilege and material ease, it's almost impossible to appreciate the privation and hardships the dispossessed (small) farmers must have suffered.
“And there is a particular resonance with the 2020s in the regime’s mission to wipe out small farmers in the name of “progress”.” — The parallels are as conspicuous as they are sickening.
Worth repeating: “His book serves as a useful reminder that British imperialism, US imperialism, Soviet communism, globalisation and the proposed “multi-polar” new world order are all aspects of one single ongoing crime against humanity.”
Yes Friar a great book “The Tower of Basel” details how ze Nazis & Dulles bros created the Bank of International Settlements (BIS)
Excellent article and an eye opening selection of examples and figures - paints a stark picture.
Revolutions seem to almost consistently bring about more oppression than whatever they just overthrew. The American revolution was followed by crushingly high taxes worse than under England, and bad enough to lead to multiple farmer’s rebellions, the French Revolution had its Terror, the Soviets a much longer terror and slave labor as you show here.
It’s like these are “Great Resets” and in a way that’s what revolution means - to revolve; go round in a circle, go back to were you just left. In each case the people were going in the right direction before the revolution - the Americans were fiercely independent, had low taxes, and forced England to back off of several new taxes using boycotts – they (the Americans) didn’t need to escalate it into a war - but they did. The French sound like they were steadily throwing off the feudal chains while still under Louis the XVI. The Russians from what I understand were rolling back feudalism even while still under the Tzars.
It’s like the revolutions are derailments throwing people off tracks that were heading in a reasonably good direction.
Not sure that my speculation is of much value in the modern context since we don’t seem to be going in the right direction to begin with so maybe getting thrown off track in the modern context would be a good thing.
So it seems that the powers that be could sense a shift on the winds, and curated the resistance into a creature of its own design, to control corral & mitigate the threat. For example, recently read that the “aristocracy” of France were funding the revolution sensing the collapse of the Royal house was imminent.
The "powers-that-be", certainly, but not necessarily the traditional aristocrats. In England, for example, Oliver Cromwell's "revolution" served to remove the Stuart monarchy and its conservatism, thus paving the way for the industrial exploitation of the population and its land - and turning the country into a base for the commercial imperialism that became globalisation. The genuine radicals in the struggle were used as pawns in a bigger game and then crushed - this is why the financiers of the City of London staged a celebratory banquet for Cromwell after he put down the rank-and-file mutiny in the New Model Army. Same pattern repeats over and over.
Great article. The more simply drawn parallels made between the ‘evils’ of the past and the evils of the present the better. As James Corbett is wont to remind us; the intent of the oligarchical parasites has been the same throughout all time. Absolute control by any means. Articles like yours help us to be able to think more clearly around these matters - and then, of course, to be able to feel and speak more clearly and incisively about them.
Thanks.
It all helps.
An interesting notion how the Bolsheviks who only remained in control for about five years unwittingly facilitated the Stalinist transformation of Czarist feudalism to state-owned industrial feudalism. Think about how much more stifling that "boot to the neck" would've been if Stalin could've deployed 21st Century surveillance technology.
Here's an article that goes into what the US became.
A nation that makes money not by production but by services like patents, tech, etc.
https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/monopoly-round-up-tariffs-abundance
But if the US doesn't feed their people, what will happen? 😂
The Rothschilds have their fingers in more pies than Jamie Oliver.
In the early 20th century the Russian oilfields at Baku were pumping more oil than the entire USA. The crude was shipped via a Rothschilds owned railroad over the mountains to a Rothschilds-run refinery at Batumi on the Black Sea to be processed and then exported by tanker. One of the Rothschilds employees at their refinery was a 23 yo Georgian. Supposedly a labor leader involved in organizing a strike for better wages - or was he really an undercover snitch less interested in worker solidarity than reporting news to his bosses the Rothschilds? The answer is hidden in the mists of time. This guy had the usual long unpronounceable Georgian name. But he would later simplify this and rise to greater prominence in the successor state to Russia, the USSR. In fact there would even be a city named after him. Just one of those coincidences, that Josef Stalin got his start as an employee of the richest family in Europe:).
Great article, thank you. Am expecting this region of small farmers in Portugal to be under attack somehow, sometime - but the rugged terrain is our advantage, unlike the flat-lands of the Alentejo.
Once again, instructive and thought-provoking. But the analogue with what is happening now is far from perfect.
First, the developed, already industrialised nations: the criminocrats are destroying key industries and putting many thousands out of work (thus effectively reducing industrial enslavement), whilst at the same time attacking small farmers and putting them out of work, in order to possess their land and either industrialise it with solar panels/batteries, or build houses on it, or 're-wild' it. None of these activities involve significant job (slave labour) creation. With the industrial sector also being decimated, dispossessed farmers also cannot find work in traditional industries either.
Second example, the Third World (Africa): globalists are actively preventing large scale industrialisation using fossil fuels as a cheap source of energy. So once again, the rural peasants who are being driven off their lands and into towns and cities will not be put to work in labour intensive industries, they will simply have no work (bar a few engaged in mining rare earth minerals for use in silly wind turbines and solar panels), and no real use that I can see, other than shipping them off to the First World to continue the process of displacement of native Europeans and Anglos in the former Colonies.
The primary purpose of today's criminocratic elite appears to be to enable massive transfer of wealth and land to the elite ruling classes, the impoverishment of the masses, not with the primary aim of enslaving them by forcing them into industrial labour, but simply by forcing them to be dependent upon a state which will withdraw support as it inevitably balloons uncontrollably, effectively meaning that the masses will starve/freeze to death/die from poverty-induced illnesses. The few left will be far more effectively and insidiously enslaved than any Russian peasant of the 1930s. They - and their children and their grandchildren - will never know anything different other than complete dependence upon the state in exchange for abject submission and the performance of minor tasks which machines cannot do. They will own nothing and be happy, confined to 15 minute cities, rarely, if ever, allowed into the rural areas reserved for the rich.
The era of mass industrial enslavement seems to be over. The elite are now in the process of harvesting the mass wealth generated from that era which was in operation over much of the 20th century. The now 'useless eaters' who formerly generated that wealth and who managed the land are now surplus to requirements and are due to be culled, once they have been dispossessed of their wealth and land.
I'm afraid you're mistaken regarding ongoing industrialisation - the industrialisation and electrification of Africa is a key and explicit aim of the global criminocracy, as I revealed in The Single Global Mafia. https://winteroak.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/cudenec-the-single-global-mafia.pdf
The term "Fourth Industrial Revolution", so favoured by the WEF, also clearly points in that direction.
I guess it depends upon your definition of 'industrialisation'. Schwab's retrogressive 'Fourth Industrial Revolution' is in fact a de-industrial revolution and the putting in place of a high tech digital maintenance and control system - which nevertheless requires an electrical infrastructure and communications network. The industrialisation which originally enslaved the masses ended up emancipating and enriching the masses, so it needed to be reversed - hence the 'Clean Energy' revolution.
Well, obviously there is no such thing as "clean energy" and the "clean" digital system depends on industrialism - extraction of minerals, manufacture, distribution, powering of the system and so on. It's not exactly the same form of industrialism as previously, any more than oil-powered industrialism was exactly the same as coal-powered industrialism, but it is the same beast. It is a means of converting organic matter (mineral, vegetal, animal, human) into a currency of power and control. Demonic.
The real useless eaters are the ones who fly jets and have multiple houses and servants.
They built the control grid that can easily be flipped on them. We are in a dystopia that can be a turn key utopia where mechanization can feed us all.
China sort of did that with their social credit system.
When an oligarch didn't play nice, they were denied access to flights and high speed trains and other luxuries. 😂
As for AI, they intended it to replace blue collar jobs but it's not really smart.
So actually, AI is better suited to replace politicians, corporate management, and finance than normal jobs that require dexterity and a brain.
It can replace what Graeber calls BULLSHIT JOBS.
"Bullshit jobs" like writers and artists?
Depends on the writers and artists.
AI cannot write or draw anything truly creative. It's derivative.
It cannot replace true creative works, just like a robot cannot replace troubleshooting in my field. Robots also cannot replace a truly skilled surgeon.
Ok the other hand, many writers and artists who just repeat bullshit are indeed bullshit jobs.
Same for parts changers in my field and pill pushers in the medical field.
Sadly though, AI is already replacing writers and artists. Many people who write fiction and paint or draw or otherwise create original art can't earn a living that way. They also need a day job in graphic design or commercial writing because creativity doesn't always pay the bills. So they may be "bullshit jobs" but they were potentially better than the bullshit job of working in a gas station or waiting tables which are the options once AI takes over the less creative side of writing and art.
It's sad but perhaps if we changed the way we see money we could have a true democracy where people didn't need to compete to survive.
Imagine if artists did art for art instead of paying mortgages.
And if we needed people to build houses, they can help paint.
A society that grows and evolves with cooperation instead of competition.
It reminds me of Imagine by John Lennon.
"Imagine"
(from "Imagine: John Lennon" soundtrack)
Imagine there's no heaven
It's easy if you try
No hell below us
Above us only sky
Imagine all the people
Living for today... Aha-ah...
Imagine there's no countries
It isn't hard to do
Nothing to kill or die for
And no religion, too
Imagine all the people
Living life in peace... You...
You may say I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will be as one
Imagine no possessions
I wonder if you can
No need for greed or hunger
A brotherhood of man
Imagine all the people
Sharing all the world... You...
You may say I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will live as one
Did you know that The Beatles worked with MK Ultra - the covert CIA operation researching and later conducting mind control? That particular song is said to be predictive programming for one-world government.
Art used for mind control purposes: literally a bullshit job!
Where is the connection to Jewish Power?
Pretty much everywhere:).
Hidden