If we wish to fully understand – and thus to effectively oppose – the global criminocrats, we need to stop thinking in terms of “politics” as currently known.
"... smears such as “extremist”, “reactionary”, “fascist”, “terrorist”, “hate criminal” and “anti-semite”" — of course the list is so much longer (racist, sexist, etc...), but THE currently most popular by far, almost-automatic smear, is "far-right". Every thing and one that is not in lockstep with the agenda is instantly labeled "far-right".
BTW, some of your readers may not know that the wheel illustration with 17 differently-coloured segments represents the UN's "Sustainable Development Goals" (SDG's). Do you know why 17 is the number of SDG's, and why the number of "Targets" for these goals is 169? Which is to say, any idea how such conspicuously un-round numbers were arrived at?
Fascinating stuff ... and strange, except when you consider how strange our would-be-god better-thans are. According to James Lindsay, the 17 comes from a geometric construct called the Spiral of Theodorus ("a spiral composed of right triangles, placed edge-to-edge" Wikipedia). 17 is the number of such triangles it takes to complete a full revolution (360 degrees). The reason for the spiral concept has to do with the "dialectical spiral".
The 169 is 13 squared. Apparently 13 is a powerful symbolic number.
Notably SDG #13 is "Climate Action" — which anyone who's aware of what the globalist cult has been pushing hardest for the last 30 years would be recognized as the linchpin, or key goal.
These criminocrats are nothing if not demonic and they're big on symbols. The title of the James Lindsay podcast (youtube) where he explains this is "Exposing the Sustainable Development Goals".
Just as great a smear is “woke”. The woke are full of people whose values have been misappropriated and manipulated by the criminocracy…who must be revelling in seeing people pull each other apart…all the while filling their coffers.
Whereas "far-right" is used by the agenda-wielding criminocracy and its useful idiots to smear anyone opposing said agenda, "woke" is used by the awake (those smeared as "far-right") to characterize said useful idiots.
It's interesting how both "woke" and "far-right" have, in these instances, been thoroughly corrupted; "woke" having come close to meaning the opposite of what it once meant; "far-right" being used as a smear against those who are anything but, by those who, ironically, are unselfaware of how close to truly "far-right" they are.
"...the criminocracy…who must be revelling in seeing people pull each other apart…all the while filling their coffers." — you got that right!
Do you really think that the awake came up with the term "woke", especially when it is anything but!? What I was trying to imply was that the criminocracy has orchestrated this whole division...and probably intentionally used the term woke to torment the awake. But how awake are the awake if they fall for the bait to label people who they disagree with them as "woke" and direct hate towards them. I used to be an environmentalist in my late teens, twenties and thirties. I also have training in psychology. All my passions and aspirations for the planet and people have been hijacked by the criminocracy and those who campaigned for support for so long, have been blinded by the money. I think of them as the blindsided awake. And a whole bunch of others (who I think you have aptly called useful idiots) have jumped on board who always missed the point but are just following the money. Rather than "woke" I prefer to call what they do HAS-J (hypocritical application of social justice) because it is more descriptive of what they do rather than who they are.
I don't disagree with anything you wrote in either of your posts.
That said, I thought your initial sentence "Just as great a smear is “woke”. " could use a bit of elaboration ... which was the purpose of my reply.
"Do you really think that the awake came up with the term "woke", especially when it is anything but!?" — no I don't.
My understanding of the term woke is that it originally meant something along the lines of this (from Wikipedia): "Woke is an adjective derived from African-American Vernacular English meaning "alert to racial prejudice and discrimination"." Its evolution and cooptation are well documented.
This is brilliantly succinct and accurate. For myself I've been completely preoccupied with no. 3 - exposing them - especially the fact that humans outnumber these monsters by, well, even if it's only 99-1 that's more than enough. Same goes for overthrowing a government - for example it was another 250,000 people marching in London on Saturday chanting their slogans and so on, before obediently marching back home again. Reminds me of that song 'where have all the flowers gone', with the repeated line 'when will they ever learn'.
It is absolutely true that were humanity to become aware of the criminocracy and all their evils - basically, the genuine existence of evil itself (in positions of money, power and influence) then the innate self-defence mechanism would kick in and no one would be able to stop the lynch mobs. No one would want to, actually. This is kind of the basis of the parallel world story I'm writing - the reason it becomes a utopia (or on the path towards utopia at least) is precisely because there is a global exposure of the monsters/criminocracy which no one can ignore. This precipitates the self-defence mechanism as mentioned above. And once this has been learned, it can't be unlearned, so that world has a kind of constant awareness of the danger of allowing evil to flourish, and thus it has a preventative mechanism - specifically because people know what evil looks like in quite some detail. Thus, they have an immunity.
In this world, the basic disguise mechanism employed by the monsters is simply 'evil always pretends to be good' - precisely because evil knows it's outnumbered and knows exactly what humanity's reaction would be when it encounters evil. Thus, the criminocracy must capture both the media and the education system to prevent the knowledge of evil, and likewise, in terms of both politics and geopolitics, project the title 'evil' onto some designated 'other' - this also goes for their false historical narratives of course.
But I am possibly preaching to the converted here! But this is a great little article and encapsulates the essential problem, and solution, brilliantly. I shall be sharing!
Thanks. Yes, absolutely. The inversion of good and evil to present themselves as the former and their opponents as the latter is fundamental to their gaslighting.
Similar thought to my hypothesis that they really should be categorised as a different (humanoid) species - by virtue of the fact that their behaviour is simply not human, as no normal human would do what they do. Since behaviour is governed by the brain, their brains must be differently wired to such an extent that this difference constitutes a genuinely different species. We may share a common ancestor, or it may be two different species evolving from two different primates (chimps (them) for example compared to bonobos (humans)) - the similarity in physical appearance would be explained by interbreeding. This would merit a separate anthropological history for that species - whereas humans had an egalitarian/anarchist state of nature, this other species would've been warlike, parasitical and aggressive (notice also how they try and make people think that 'all humans' are like that - the so-called 'bellicose' school of anthropology - which has pretty much been discredited/debunked, although still maintains a damaging presence in the subject).
Well, even if this explanation sounds a little esoteric, it makes some kind of (neuro)scientific sense to me. It would also explain why, being so outnumbered, they are constantly terrified about humans to the extent of paranoia - which explains their actions, their need for so much power and control and misdirection...
Right on the money! (no pun intended)
"... smears such as “extremist”, “reactionary”, “fascist”, “terrorist”, “hate criminal” and “anti-semite”" — of course the list is so much longer (racist, sexist, etc...), but THE currently most popular by far, almost-automatic smear, is "far-right". Every thing and one that is not in lockstep with the agenda is instantly labeled "far-right".
BTW, some of your readers may not know that the wheel illustration with 17 differently-coloured segments represents the UN's "Sustainable Development Goals" (SDG's). Do you know why 17 is the number of SDG's, and why the number of "Targets" for these goals is 169? Which is to say, any idea how such conspicuously un-round numbers were arrived at?
Spot on regarding the term" "far-right". Have added it in now! Thanks
No, don't know where those numbers came from - I suspect you may be about to tell us!
You suspect right!
Fascinating stuff ... and strange, except when you consider how strange our would-be-god better-thans are. According to James Lindsay, the 17 comes from a geometric construct called the Spiral of Theodorus ("a spiral composed of right triangles, placed edge-to-edge" Wikipedia). 17 is the number of such triangles it takes to complete a full revolution (360 degrees). The reason for the spiral concept has to do with the "dialectical spiral".
The 169 is 13 squared. Apparently 13 is a powerful symbolic number.
Notably SDG #13 is "Climate Action" — which anyone who's aware of what the globalist cult has been pushing hardest for the last 30 years would be recognized as the linchpin, or key goal.
These criminocrats are nothing if not demonic and they're big on symbols. The title of the James Lindsay podcast (youtube) where he explains this is "Exposing the Sustainable Development Goals".
Just as great a smear is “woke”. The woke are full of people whose values have been misappropriated and manipulated by the criminocracy…who must be revelling in seeing people pull each other apart…all the while filling their coffers.
"Woke" is virtually the opposite of "far-right".
Whereas "far-right" is used by the agenda-wielding criminocracy and its useful idiots to smear anyone opposing said agenda, "woke" is used by the awake (those smeared as "far-right") to characterize said useful idiots.
It's interesting how both "woke" and "far-right" have, in these instances, been thoroughly corrupted; "woke" having come close to meaning the opposite of what it once meant; "far-right" being used as a smear against those who are anything but, by those who, ironically, are unselfaware of how close to truly "far-right" they are.
"...the criminocracy…who must be revelling in seeing people pull each other apart…all the while filling their coffers." — you got that right!
Do you really think that the awake came up with the term "woke", especially when it is anything but!? What I was trying to imply was that the criminocracy has orchestrated this whole division...and probably intentionally used the term woke to torment the awake. But how awake are the awake if they fall for the bait to label people who they disagree with them as "woke" and direct hate towards them. I used to be an environmentalist in my late teens, twenties and thirties. I also have training in psychology. All my passions and aspirations for the planet and people have been hijacked by the criminocracy and those who campaigned for support for so long, have been blinded by the money. I think of them as the blindsided awake. And a whole bunch of others (who I think you have aptly called useful idiots) have jumped on board who always missed the point but are just following the money. Rather than "woke" I prefer to call what they do HAS-J (hypocritical application of social justice) because it is more descriptive of what they do rather than who they are.
I don't disagree with anything you wrote in either of your posts.
That said, I thought your initial sentence "Just as great a smear is “woke”. " could use a bit of elaboration ... which was the purpose of my reply.
"Do you really think that the awake came up with the term "woke", especially when it is anything but!?" — no I don't.
My understanding of the term woke is that it originally meant something along the lines of this (from Wikipedia): "Woke is an adjective derived from African-American Vernacular English meaning "alert to racial prejudice and discrimination"." Its evolution and cooptation are well documented.
Here translated into Spanish: https://www.counterpropaganda.info/p/un-abc-para-oponerse-a-la-criminocracia
Great. Thanks!
Thank you for writing it! I wish I had time to translate all your works... Greetings from Spain. :-)
This is brilliantly succinct and accurate. For myself I've been completely preoccupied with no. 3 - exposing them - especially the fact that humans outnumber these monsters by, well, even if it's only 99-1 that's more than enough. Same goes for overthrowing a government - for example it was another 250,000 people marching in London on Saturday chanting their slogans and so on, before obediently marching back home again. Reminds me of that song 'where have all the flowers gone', with the repeated line 'when will they ever learn'.
It is absolutely true that were humanity to become aware of the criminocracy and all their evils - basically, the genuine existence of evil itself (in positions of money, power and influence) then the innate self-defence mechanism would kick in and no one would be able to stop the lynch mobs. No one would want to, actually. This is kind of the basis of the parallel world story I'm writing - the reason it becomes a utopia (or on the path towards utopia at least) is precisely because there is a global exposure of the monsters/criminocracy which no one can ignore. This precipitates the self-defence mechanism as mentioned above. And once this has been learned, it can't be unlearned, so that world has a kind of constant awareness of the danger of allowing evil to flourish, and thus it has a preventative mechanism - specifically because people know what evil looks like in quite some detail. Thus, they have an immunity.
In this world, the basic disguise mechanism employed by the monsters is simply 'evil always pretends to be good' - precisely because evil knows it's outnumbered and knows exactly what humanity's reaction would be when it encounters evil. Thus, the criminocracy must capture both the media and the education system to prevent the knowledge of evil, and likewise, in terms of both politics and geopolitics, project the title 'evil' onto some designated 'other' - this also goes for their false historical narratives of course.
But I am possibly preaching to the converted here! But this is a great little article and encapsulates the essential problem, and solution, brilliantly. I shall be sharing!
Thanks. Yes, absolutely. The inversion of good and evil to present themselves as the former and their opponents as the latter is fundamental to their gaslighting.
Maybe the whole shebang breaks down into two distinct camps. The humans and the anti-humans.
Similar thought to my hypothesis that they really should be categorised as a different (humanoid) species - by virtue of the fact that their behaviour is simply not human, as no normal human would do what they do. Since behaviour is governed by the brain, their brains must be differently wired to such an extent that this difference constitutes a genuinely different species. We may share a common ancestor, or it may be two different species evolving from two different primates (chimps (them) for example compared to bonobos (humans)) - the similarity in physical appearance would be explained by interbreeding. This would merit a separate anthropological history for that species - whereas humans had an egalitarian/anarchist state of nature, this other species would've been warlike, parasitical and aggressive (notice also how they try and make people think that 'all humans' are like that - the so-called 'bellicose' school of anthropology - which has pretty much been discredited/debunked, although still maintains a damaging presence in the subject).
Well, even if this explanation sounds a little esoteric, it makes some kind of (neuro)scientific sense to me. It would also explain why, being so outnumbered, they are constantly terrified about humans to the extent of paranoia - which explains their actions, their need for so much power and control and misdirection...
I agree...I didn't explain myself very well and I appreciate your engagement in my comment.
The Moving Contradiction
it's not Malthus after all...
https://tomg2021.substack.com/p/the-moving-contradiction
Thanks. No, I've read *about* those ideas of Foucault, but not his actual writing. Something else to get round to, one day!
Thanks. Yes, "the political dream of an exhaustive, unobstructed power" has certainly been particuarly in evidence since our pseudo-plague...