Excellent Paul. The Fascist political system always seemed more "natural' for the Jewish financial wiz kids of the last 3 centuries since it combines two ultimate sources of power - Government/Corporate - into one massive and all powerful amalgamation to control. But even the Atheist Jewish opportunists will do what is necessary to install a Judeo dominated world, as in the case of modern "Zionism", created by an Atheist in wolfs clothing. The "Zionism" founder, Theodore Herzi, was an Austrian Hungarian journalist and lawyer. He did not believe in God and therefore any notion of an ordained and chosen people. But he did know how to give religious cover to a political, not religious, movement in order to gain power and money.
In my little corner of the world, It appears that fascism, communism and corporatism all hatched from the same ZIM egg. This is why public narratives are carefully constructed to paint these political systems as polar opposites. They appear to me as three peas in a pod. Or am I fooling myself?
ZIM financial backing for all three major 19th century dictators: Mussolini + Stalin + Hitler is evidenced in their appearance on three different front pages of TIME magazine.
All 3 were portrayed as the type of tough assertive leaders who were needed to lead their respective states through the 1930s Depression crisis.
Re- the fascist corporate co-option of trade unions
There is Robert Ley another key Jewish component of Hitler's regime. He was leader of the Nazi "German Labour Front".
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power."
BTW Thomas Lamont, Guarantee Trust Co. gave $100 Million dollar loan to Mussolini, 1926
***
The first thing both Mussolini and Hitler did when they came to power was abolish all workers' Unions and strikes, cut wages and increase military spending.
I wrote about Mussolini today because I'm exhaustively studying MAGA rhetoric and the enduring appeal of Trump -- then my research kept pointing me to Benito M and his blackshirts. The parallels between he and DJT are fascinating and revolting at the same time. I didn't realize they both bragged about failed assassination attempts and both were grazed by bullets on superficial parts of their body! Both bragged about sexual assault and both were credibly accused of rape. But the similarities were especially clear listening to old Mussolini speeches about countries being led best by the angriest misfits at the bottom of the barrel -- people discarded by the socialists who promised them everything and left them with nothing. That Italian phrase the fascists used, I don't give a damn” is very close to MAGA’s fuck your feelings: https://jenniferrusson.substack.com/p/so-you-think-donald-trump-is-a-fascist?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=8jgmhy
Excellent article. Much to be recommended. Just to add a couple of (largely irrelevant) footnotes:
Mussolini was, according to The Guardian (see below), financed by British intelligence (most probably to keep Italy in the war) and was a British asset.
According to the novel: M, he was financed by the French too (for much the same reason).
Churchill is said to have written fan letters to Mussolini (even in 1944!!!) while Otto Skorzeny is said to have stolen them (which meant that Mussolini wasn’t able to blackmail Churchill (and died as a consequence) while Skorzeny was).
Mussolini seems to have been one of only a handful of people to have seen documents proving Hitler was Jewish. Another, Heydrich, was also assassinated while a third moved to America and remained silent about this fact.
There is a real, valuable insight here: authoritarian systems are not aberrations; they are emergency tools of concentrated power. But the delivery sometimes trades explanatory power for polemic heat. Strip the identity fog, keep the institutional anatomy, and the thesis gets sharper—not weaker.
Excellent Paul. The Fascist political system always seemed more "natural' for the Jewish financial wiz kids of the last 3 centuries since it combines two ultimate sources of power - Government/Corporate - into one massive and all powerful amalgamation to control. But even the Atheist Jewish opportunists will do what is necessary to install a Judeo dominated world, as in the case of modern "Zionism", created by an Atheist in wolfs clothing. The "Zionism" founder, Theodore Herzi, was an Austrian Hungarian journalist and lawyer. He did not believe in God and therefore any notion of an ordained and chosen people. But he did know how to give religious cover to a political, not religious, movement in order to gain power and money.
Grazie Paolo! Another brick in our wall of understanding ... keep stackin'!
Thanks Paul. Another history lesson. Sounds to me like there are really just two camps, the ZIM or whatever it is called today and the rest of us?
It is looking that way, yes!
In my little corner of the world, It appears that fascism, communism and corporatism all hatched from the same ZIM egg. This is why public narratives are carefully constructed to paint these political systems as polar opposites. They appear to me as three peas in a pod. Or am I fooling myself?
Yes, that's the conclusion I have reached as well.
ZIM financial backing for all three major 19th century dictators: Mussolini + Stalin + Hitler is evidenced in their appearance on three different front pages of TIME magazine.
All 3 were portrayed as the type of tough assertive leaders who were needed to lead their respective states through the 1930s Depression crisis.
Re- the fascist corporate co-option of trade unions
There is Robert Ley another key Jewish component of Hitler's regime. He was leader of the Nazi "German Labour Front".
And having a jewish person in this position further dispels that nonsense of the 6 million holohoax perpetual grift of a lie.
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power."
BTW Thomas Lamont, Guarantee Trust Co. gave $100 Million dollar loan to Mussolini, 1926
***
The first thing both Mussolini and Hitler did when they came to power was abolish all workers' Unions and strikes, cut wages and increase military spending.
youtu.be/7f_V9zZNzTY?t=971
Please change from: "Il Populo d'Italia" to: "Il Popolo d'Italia".
Ah, thanks.
I wrote about Mussolini today because I'm exhaustively studying MAGA rhetoric and the enduring appeal of Trump -- then my research kept pointing me to Benito M and his blackshirts. The parallels between he and DJT are fascinating and revolting at the same time. I didn't realize they both bragged about failed assassination attempts and both were grazed by bullets on superficial parts of their body! Both bragged about sexual assault and both were credibly accused of rape. But the similarities were especially clear listening to old Mussolini speeches about countries being led best by the angriest misfits at the bottom of the barrel -- people discarded by the socialists who promised them everything and left them with nothing. That Italian phrase the fascists used, I don't give a damn” is very close to MAGA’s fuck your feelings: https://jenniferrusson.substack.com/p/so-you-think-donald-trump-is-a-fascist?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=8jgmhy
Excellent article. Much to be recommended. Just to add a couple of (largely irrelevant) footnotes:
Mussolini was, according to The Guardian (see below), financed by British intelligence (most probably to keep Italy in the war) and was a British asset.
According to the novel: M, he was financed by the French too (for much the same reason).
Churchill is said to have written fan letters to Mussolini (even in 1944!!!) while Otto Skorzeny is said to have stolen them (which meant that Mussolini wasn’t able to blackmail Churchill (and died as a consequence) while Skorzeny was).
Mussolini seems to have been one of only a handful of people to have seen documents proving Hitler was Jewish. Another, Heydrich, was also assassinated while a third moved to America and remained silent about this fact.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/oct/13/benito-mussolini-recruited-mi5-italy
Very good.. that was solid. Make sense why italy change allierte before ww1..
There is a real, valuable insight here: authoritarian systems are not aberrations; they are emergency tools of concentrated power. But the delivery sometimes trades explanatory power for polemic heat. Strip the identity fog, keep the institutional anatomy, and the thesis gets sharper—not weaker.
— Lone Wolf